mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoring

arXiv 2012.03749 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2020q-fin.RM cs.AI cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the ever-growing achievements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the recent boosted enthusiasm in Financial Technology (FinTech), applications such as credit scoring have gained substantial academic interest. Credit scoring helps financial experts make better decisions regarding whether or not to accept a loan application, such that loans with a high probability of default are not accepted. Apart from the noisy and highly imbalanced data challenges faced by such credit scoring models, recent regulations such as the `right to explanation' introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) have added the need for model interpretability to ensure that algorithmic decisions are understandable and coherent. An interesting concept that has been recently introduced is eXplainable AI (XAI), which focuses on making black-box models more interpretable. In this work, we present a credit scoring model that is both accurate and interpretable. For classification, state-of-the-art performance on the Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) and Lending Club (LC) Datasets is achieved using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. The model is then further enhanced with a 360-degree explanation framework, which provides different explanations (i.e. global, local feature-based and local instance-based) that are required by different people in different situations. Evaluation through the use of functionallygrounded, application-grounded and human-grounded analysis show that the explanations provided are simple, consistent as well as satisfy the six predetermined hypotheses testing for correctness, effectiveness, easy understanding, detail sufficiency and trustworthiness.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanationscited by 80
  2. 2021A Framework and Benchmarking Study for Counterfactual Generating Methods on Tabular Datacited by 19
  3. 2023Explainable, Interpretable & Trustworthy AI for Intelligent Digital Twin: Case Study on Remaining Useful Lifecited by 19
  4. 2025Explainability in Practice: A Survey of Explainable NLP Across Various Domainscited by 11
  5. 2023A Comprehensive Review on Financial Explainable AIcited by 10
  6. 2022SHAP-XRT: The Shapley Value Meets Conditional Independence Testingcited by 6
  7. 2021Interpretability in deep learning for finance: a case study for the Heston modelcited by 5
  8. 2025Language Model Guided Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Tradingcited by 3
  9. 2021Explaining Credit Risk Scoring through Feature Contribution Alignment with Expert Risk Analystscited by 1
  10. 2024Linear Discriminant Analysis in Credit Scoring: A Transparent Hybrid Model Approachcited by 1
  11. 2025Holistic Explainable AI (H-XAI): Extending Transparency Beyond Developers in AI-Driven Decision Makingcited by 1
  12. 2022I Know Therefore I Score: Label-Free Crafting of Scoring Functions using Constraints Based on Domain Expertisecited by 0
6 more
  1. 2022Generating detailed saliency maps using model-agnostic methodscited by 0
  2. 2023Peeking Inside the Schufa Blackbox: Explaining the German Housing Scoring Systemcited by 0
  3. 2025Class-Imbalanced-Aware Adaptive Dataset Distillation for Scalable Pretrained Model on Credit Scoringcited by 0
  4. 2025WISCA: A Consensus-Based Approach to Harmonizing Interpretability in Tabular Datasetscited by 0
  5. 2025Unlocking the Black Box: A Five-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Explainable AI in Credit Riskcited by 0
  6. 2026NOMADD: Numerical Optimization of Models Adapting to Data Driftcited by 0