mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Holistic Explainable AI (H-XAI): Extending Transparency Beyond Developers in AI-Driven Decision Making

arXiv 2508.05792 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2025cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems increasingly mediate decisions in domains such as credit scoring and financial forecasting, their lack of transparency and bias raises critical concerns for fairness and public trust. Existing explainable AI (XAI) approaches largely serve developers, focusing on model justification rather than the needs of affected users or regulators. We introduce Holistic eXplainable AI (H-XAI), a framework that integrates causality-based rating methods with post-hoc explanation techniques to support transparent, stakeholder-aligned evaluation of AI systems deployed in online decision contexts. H-XAI treats explanation as an interactive, hypothesis-driven process, allowing users, auditors, and organizations to ask questions, test hypotheses, and compare model behavior against automatically generated random and biased baselines. By combining global and instance-level explanations, H-XAI helps communicate model bias and instability that shape everyday digital decisions. Through case studies in credit risk assessment and stock price prediction, we show how H-XAI extends explainability beyond developers toward responsible and inclusive AI practices that strengthen accountability in sociotechnical systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.

Builds on

21 of 83 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  4. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
  5. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  6. 2018Temporal Pattern Attention for Multivariate Time Series Forecastingcited by 125
  7. 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
  8. 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
  9. 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63
  10. 2023Causal Discovery from Temporal Data: An Overview and New Perspectivescited by 43
  11. 2021Explaining a Series of Models by Propagating Shapley Valuescited by 37
  12. 2021Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 31
9 more
  1. 2018EA-LSTM: Evolutionary Attention-based LSTM for Time Series Predictioncited by 26
  2. 2020Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoringcited by 18
  3. 2020Machine Learning Explainability for External Stakeholderscited by 17
  4. 2020Personalized Chatbot Trustworthiness Ratingscited by 6
  5. 2023Rating Sentiment Analysis Systems for Bias through a Causal Lenscited by 6
  6. 2023Advances in Automatically Rating the Trustworthiness of Text Processing Servicescited by 6
  7. 2025Demystifying the Accuracy-Interpretability Trade-Off: A Case Study of Inferring Ratings from Reviewscited by 5
  8. 2024The Effect of Human v/s Synthetic Test Data and Round-tripping on Assessment of Sentiment Analysis Systems for Biascited by 4
  9. 2024Rating Multi-Modal Time-Series Forecasting Models (MM-TSFM) for Robustness Through a Causal Lenscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.