mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generating detailed saliency maps using model-agnostic methods

arXiv 2209.09202 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emerging field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence focuses on researching methods of explaining the decision making processes of complex machine learning models. In the field of explainability for Computer Vision, explanations are provided as saliency maps, which visualize the importance of individual pixels of the input w.r.t. the model's prediction. In this work we focus on a perturbation-based, model-agnostic explainability method called RISE, elaborate on observed shortcomings of its grid-based approach and propose two modifications: replacement of square occlusions with convex polygonal occlusions based on cells of a Voronoi mesh and addition of an informativeness guarantee to the occlusion mask generator. These modifications, collectively called VRISE (Voronoi-RISE), are meant to, respectively, improve the accuracy of maps generated using large occlusions and accelerate convergence of saliency maps in cases where sampling density is either very low or very high. We perform a quantitative comparison of accuracy of saliency maps produced by VRISE and RISE on the validation split of ILSVRC2012, using a saliency-guided content insertion/deletion metric and a localization metric based on bounding boxes. Additionally, we explore the space of configurable occlusion pattern parameters to better understand their influence on saliency maps produced by RISE and VRISE. We also describe and demonstrate two effects observed over the course of experimentation, arising from the random sampling approach of RISE: "feature slicing" and "saliency misattribution". Our results show that convex polygonal occlusions yield more accurate maps for coarse occlusion meshes and multi-object images, but improvement is not guaranteed in other cases. The informativeness guarantee is shown to increase the convergence rate without incurring a significant computational overhead.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2022.

Builds on

29 of 64 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  7. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  8. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  12. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
17 more
  1. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
  2. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  3. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  4. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  5. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  6. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  7. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  8. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  9. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  10. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
  11. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  12. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  13. 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
  14. 2020Black-box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Mapscited by 74
  15. 2019Efficient Saliency Maps for Explainable AIcited by 30
  16. 2020Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoringcited by 18
  17. 2020Quantitative Evaluations on Saliency Methods: An Experimental Studycited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.