mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Complexity of Neural Network Training and ETR: Extensions with Effectively Continuous Functions

arXiv 2305.11833 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.LO cs.AI cs.CCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the complexity of the problem of training neural networks defined via various activation functions. The training problem is known to be existsR-complete with respect to linear activation functions and the ReLU activation function. We consider the complexity of the problem with respect to the sigmoid activation function and other effectively continuous functions. We show that these training problems are polynomial-time many-one bireducible to the existential theory of the reals extended with the corresponding activation functions. In particular, we establish that the sigmoid activation function leads to the existential theory of the reals with the exponential function. It is thus open, and equivalent with the decidability of the existential theory of the reals with the exponential function, whether training neural networks using the sigmoid activation function is algorithmically solvable. In contrast, we obtain that the training problem is undecidable if sinusoidal activation functions are considered. Finally, we obtain general upper bounds for the complexity of the training problem in the form of low levels of the arithmetical hierarchy.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

3 of 20 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Tight Hardness Results for Training Depth-2 ReLU Networkscited by 35
  2. 2018Complexity of Training ReLU Neural Networkcited by 23
  3. 2022Training Fully Connected Neural Networks is existsℝ-Completecited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

4 papers.