mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decentralized Attribution of Generative Models

arXiv 2010.13974 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2020cs.CV eess.IVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Growing applications of generative models have led to new threats such as malicious personation and digital copyright infringement. One solution to these threats is model attribution, i.e., the identification of user-end models where the contents under question are generated from. Existing studies showed empirical feasibility of attribution through a centralized classifier trained on all user-end models. However, this approach is not scalable in reality as the number of models ever grows. Neither does it provide an attributability guarantee. To this end, this paper studies decentralized attribution, which relies on binary classifiers associated with each user-end model. Each binary classifier is parameterized by a user-specific key and distinguishes its associated model distribution from the authentic data distribution. We develop sufficient conditions of the keys that guarantee an attributability lower bound. Our method is validated on MNIST, CelebA, and FFHQ datasets. We also examine the trade-off between generation quality and robustness of attribution against adversarial post-processes.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 6; 2025: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: