mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalized Deepfake Attribution

arXiv 2406.18278 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.CV eess.IVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The landscape of fake media creation changed with the introduction of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN s). Fake media creation has been on the rise with the rapid advances in generation technology, leading to new challenges in Detecting fake media. A fundamental characteristic of GAN s is their sensitivity to parameter initialization, known as seeds. Each distinct seed utilized during training leads to the creation of unique model instances, resulting in divergent image outputs despite employing the same architecture. This means that even if we have one GAN architecture, it can produce countless variations of GAN models depending on the seed used. Existing methods for attributing deepfakes work well only if they have seen the specific GAN model during training. If the GAN architectures are retrained with a different seed, these methods struggle to attribute the fakes. This seed dependency issue made it difficult to attribute deepfakes with existing methods. We proposed a generalized deepfake attribution network (GDA-N et) to attribute fake images to their respective GAN architectures, even if they are generated from a retrained version of the GAN architecture with a different seed (cross-seed) or from the fine-tuned version of the existing GAN model. Extensive experiments on cross-seed and fine-tuned data of GAN models show that our method is highly effective compared to existing methods. We have provided the source code to validate our results.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
  2. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  3. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  4. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  5. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,184
  6. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
  7. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
  8. 2021Multi-attentional Deepfake Detectioncited by 341
  9. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
  10. 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
  11. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 247
  12. 2020Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Datacited by 201
9 more
  1. 2018Do GANs leave artificial fingerprints?cited by 190
  2. 2020Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprintingcited by 91
  3. 2020DeepFake Detection by Analyzing Convolutional Tracescited by 81
  4. 2021Reverse Engineering of Generative Models: Inferring Model Hyperparameters from Generated Imagescited by 58
  5. 2022Deepfake Network Architecture Attributioncited by 47
  6. 2020T-GD: Transferable GAN-generated Images Detection Frameworkcited by 28
  7. 2021DeepfakeUCL: Deepfake Detection via Unsupervised Contrastive Learningcited by 20
  8. 2020Decentralized Attribution of Generative Modelscited by 17
  9. 2019Scalable Fine-grained Generated Image Classification Based on Deep Metric Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.