Tractable contextual bandits beyond realizability
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Tractable contextual bandit algorithms often rely on the realizability assumption - i.e., that the true expected reward model belongs to a known class, such as linear functions. In this work, we present a tractable bandit algorithm that is not sensitive to the realizability assumption and computationally reduces to solving a constrained regression problem in every epoch. When realizability does not hold, our algorithm ensures the same guarantees on regret achieved by realizability-based algorithms under realizability, up to an additive term that accounts for the misspecification error. This extra term is proportional to T times a function of the mean squared error between the best model in the class and the true model, where T is the total number of time-steps. Our work sheds light on the bias-variance trade-off for tractable contextual bandits. This trade-off is not captured by algorithms that assume realizability, since under this assumption there exists an estimator in the class that attains zero bias.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Banditscited by 40
- 2021Metadata-based Multi-Task Bandits with Bayesian Hierarchical Modelscited by 24
- 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits with Offline Regression Oraclescited by 21
- 2021On component interactions in two-stage recommender systemscited by 14
- 2022Towards Scalable and Robust Structured Bandits: A Meta-Learning Frameworkcited by 10
- 2026Reinforcement Learning in the Real World: A Survey of Statistical Challenges and Future Directionscited by 5
- 2021Towards Costless Model Selection in Contextual Bandits: A Bias-Variance Perspectivecited by 4
- 2023No-Regret Linear Bandits beyond Realizabilitycited by 2
- 2026Reinforcement Learning in the Real World: A Survey of Statistical Challenges and Future Directions21 Jan 2026
- 2023No-Regret Linear Bandits beyond Realizability26 Feb 2023
- 2022Towards Scalable and Robust Structured Bandits: A Meta-Learning Framework26 Feb 2022
- 2021Metadata-based Multi-Task Bandits with Bayesian Hierarchical Models13 Aug 2021
- 2021On component interactions in two-stage recommender systems28 Jun 2021
- 2021Towards Costless Model Selection in Contextual Bandits: A Bias-Variance Perspective11 Jun 2021
- 2021Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Bandits3 Jun 2021
- 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits with Offline Regression Oracles26 Feb 2021
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Flow-Corrected Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Contextual Bandits
- 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity
- 2023Bad Values but Good Behavior: Learning Highly Misspecified Bandits and MDPs
- 2025Provable Anytime Ensemble Sampling Algorithms in Nonlinear Contextual Bandits
- 2024Thompson Sampling for Stochastic Bandits with Noisy Contexts: An Information-Theoretic Regret Analysis
- 2025Statistical Inference for Misspecified Contextual Bandits
- 2023Contextual Bandits and Imitation Learning via Preference-Based Active Queries
- 2023Adversarial Rewards in Universal Learning for Contextual Bandits