mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Rewards in Universal Learning for Contextual Bandits

arXiv 2302.07186 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2023stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the fundamental limits of learning in contextual bandits, where a learner's rewards depend on their actions and a known context, which extends the canonical multi-armed bandit to the case where side-information is available. We are interested in universally consistent algorithms, which achieve sublinear regret compared to any measurable fixed policy, without any function class restriction. For stationary contextual bandits, when the underlying reward mechanism is time-invariant, Blanchard et. al (2022) characterized learnable context processes for which universal consistency is achievable; and further gave algorithms ensuring universal consistency whenever this is achievable, a property known as optimistic universal consistency. It is well understood, however, that reward mechanisms can evolve over time, possibly adversarially, and depending on the learner's actions. We show that optimistic universal learning for contextual bandits with adversarial rewards is impossible in general, contrary to all previously studied settings in online learning -- including standard supervised learning. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for universal learning under various adversarial reward models, and an exact characterization for online rewards. In particular, the set of learnable processes for these reward models is still extremely general -- larger than i.i.d., stationary or ergodic -- but in general strictly smaller than that for supervised learning or stationary contextual bandits, shedding light on new adversarial phenomena.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 10 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2023.

Builds on

10 of 45 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
  2. 2019A New Algorithm for Non-stationary Contextual Bandits: Efficient, Optimal, and Parameter-freecited by 71
  3. 2020Universal consistency and rates of convergence of multiclass prototype algorithms in metric spacescited by 18
  4. 2020Self-Tuning Bandits over Unknown Covariate-Shiftscited by 12
  5. 2022Universal Online Learning: an Optimistically Universal Learning Rulecited by 12
  6. 2021Universal Online Learning with Bounded Loss: Reduction to Binary Classificationcited by 8
  7. 2022Universal Online Learning with Unbounded Losses: Memory Is All You Needcited by 8
  8. 2022Universally Consistent Online Learning with Arbitrarily Dependent Responsescited by 6
  9. 2022Universal Regression with Adversarial Responsescited by 5
  10. 2022Contextual Bandits and Optimistically Universal Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits with Offline Regression Oracles
  2. 2026Learning to Attack: A Bandit Approach to Adversarial Context Poisoning
  3. 2021Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization
  4. 2020Tractable contextual bandits beyond realizability
  5. 2026Flow-Corrected Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Contextual Bandits
  6. 2024Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits from Adversarial Feedback
  7. 2025Contextual Bandit Optimization with Pre-Trained Neural Networks
  8. 2022Flexible and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Oracles