mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Differentially Private Text Perturbation Method Using a Regularized Mahalanobis Metric

arXiv 2010.11947 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2020cs.CL cs.CR cs.LGcited by 41

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Balancing the privacy-utility tradeoff is a crucial requirement of many practical machine learning systems that deal with sensitive customer data. A popular approach for privacy-preserving text analysis is noise injection, in which text data is first mapped into a continuous embedding space, perturbed by sampling a spherical noise from an appropriate distribution, and then projected back to the discrete vocabulary space. While this allows the perturbation to admit the required metric differential privacy, often the utility of downstream tasks modeled on this perturbed data is low because the spherical noise does not account for the variability in the density around different words in the embedding space. In particular, words in a sparse region are likely unchanged even when the noise scale is large. %Using the global sensitivity of the mechanism can potentially add too much noise to the words in the dense regions of the embedding space, causing a high utility loss, whereas using local sensitivity can leak information through the scale of the noise added. In this paper, we propose a text perturbation mechanism based on a carefully designed regularized variant of the Mahalanobis metric to overcome this problem. For any given noise scale, this metric adds an elliptical noise to account for the covariance structure in the embedding space. This heterogeneity in the noise scale along different directions helps ensure that the words in the sparse region have sufficient likelihood of replacement without sacrificing the overall utility. We provide a text-perturbation algorithm based on this metric and formally prove its privacy guarantees. Additionally, we empirically show that our mechanism improves the privacy statistics to achieve the same level of utility as compared to the state-of-the-art Laplace mechanism.

Key facts. Cited by 41 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 11; 2024: 13; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

41 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generationcited by 94
  2. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
  3. 2023Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Promptingcited by 63
  4. 2021Selective Differential Privacy for Language Modelingcited by 61
  5. 2023DP-OPT: Make Large Language Model Your Privacy-Preserving Prompt Engineercited by 56
  6. 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 54
  7. 2022Submix: Practical Private Prediction for Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 31
  8. 2023DP-BART for Privatized Text Rewriting under Local Differential Privacycited by 27
  9. 2024PrivacyRestore: Privacy-Preserving Inference in Large Language Models via Privacy Removal and Restorationcited by 27
  10. 2024Privacy Preserving Prompt Engineering: A Surveycited by 24
  11. 2023Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directionscited by 20
  12. 2021On a Utilitarian Approach to Privacy Preserving Text Generationcited by 17
29 more
  1. 2023Guiding Text-to-Text Privatization by Syntaxcited by 14
  2. 2023Driving Context into Text-to-Text Privatizationcited by 13
  3. 2022Differential Privacy in Natural Language Processing: The Story So Farcited by 12
  4. 2022You Are What You Write: Preserving Privacy in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 11
  5. 2024A Comparative Analysis of Word-Level Metric Differential Privacy: Benchmarking The Privacy-Utility Trade-offcited by 11
  6. 20241-Diffractor: Efficient and Utility-Preserving Text Obfuscation Leveraging Word-Level Metric Differential Privacycited by 10
  7. 2024Just Rewrite It Again: A Post-Processing Method for Enhanced Semantic Similarity and Privacy Preservation of Differentially Private Rewritten Textcited by 9
  8. 2024Privacy-Preserving Language Model Inference with Instance Obfuscationcited by 6
  9. 2024Estimating Privacy Leakage of Augmented Contextual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 6
  10. 2025Privacy-Preserving LLM Embedding Transmission for End-Cloud Collaborationcited by 5
  11. 2023A Neighbourhood-Aware Differential Privacy Mechanism for Static Word Embeddingscited by 4
  12. 2024Private Language Models via Truncated Laplacian Mechanismcited by 3
  13. 2023LatticeGen: A Cooperative Framework which Hides Generated Text in a Lattice for Privacy-Aware Generation on Cloudcited by 2
  14. 2023PrIeD-KIE: Towards Privacy Preserved Document Key Information Extractioncited by 2
  15. 2024A Collocation-based Method for Addressing Challenges in Word-level Metric Differential Privacycited by 2
  16. 2025DP-GTR: Differentially Private Prompt Protection via Group Text Rewritingcited by 2
  17. 2025Inspecting the Representation Manifold of Differentially-Private Textcited by 2
  18. 2025Privacy Preserving In-Context-Learning Framework for Large Language Modelscited by 2
  19. 2026STAMP: Selective Task-Aware Mechanism for Text Privacycited by 2
  20. 2025Investigating User Perspectives on Differentially Private Text Privatizationcited by 1
  21. 2025The Double-edged Sword of LLM-based Data Reconstruction: Understanding and Mitigating Contextual Vulnerability in Word-level Differential Privacy Text Sanitizationcited by 1
  22. 2021rx-anon -- A Novel Approach on the De-Identification of Heterogeneous Data based on a Modified Mondrian Algorithmcited by 0
  23. 2023Disentangling the Linguistic Competence of Privacy-Preserving BERTcited by 0
  24. 2024Characterizing Stereotypical Bias from Privacy-preserving Pre-Trainingcited by 0
  25. 2024A Different Level Text Protection Mechanism With Differential Privacycited by 0
  26. 2024Which PPML Would a User Choose? A Structured Decision Support Framework for Developers to Rank PPML Techniques Based on User Acceptance Criteriacited by 0
  27. 2026Provably Communication-Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Federated Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
  28. 2026Denoising-Aware Inversion: Revealing Privacy Risks in Noise-Protected Text Embeddingscited by 0
  29. 2026PrivBench: A Holistic and Modular Benchmarking Platform for Evaluating Text-to-Text Privatizationcited by 0