mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comparative Analysis of Word-Level Metric Differential Privacy: Benchmarking The Privacy-Utility Trade-off

arXiv 2404.03324 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The application of Differential Privacy to Natural Language Processing techniques has emerged in relevance in recent years, with an increasing number of studies published in established NLP outlets. In particular, the adaptation of Differential Privacy for use in NLP tasks has first focused on the textitword-level, where calibrated noise is added to word embedding vectors to achieve "noisy" representations. To this end, several implementations have appeared in the literature, each presenting an alternative method of achieving word-level Differential Privacy. Although each of these includes its own evaluation, no comparative analysis has been performed to investigate the performance of such methods relative to each other. In this work, we conduct such an analysis, comparing seven different algorithms on two NLP tasks with varying hyperparameters, including the textitepsilon (varepsilon) parameter, or privacy budget. In addition, we provide an in-depth analysis of the results with a focus on the privacy-utility trade-off, as well as open-source our implementation code for further reproduction. As a result of our analysis, we give insight into the benefits and challenges of word-level Differential Privacy, and accordingly, we suggest concrete steps forward for the research field.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

26 of 48 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  5. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  6. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  7. 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 199
  8. 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 189
  9. 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
  10. 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 115
  11. 2021Differential Privacy for Text Analytics via Natural Text Sanitizationcited by 74
  12. 2020Differentially Private Representation for NLP: Formal Guarantee and An Empirical Study on Privacy and Fairnesscited by 66
14 more
  1. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
  2. 2019Leveraging Hierarchical Representations for Preserving Privacy and Utility in Textcited by 49
  3. 2021TEM: High Utility Metric Differential Privacy on Textcited by 43
  4. 2020A Differentially Private Text Perturbation Method Using a Regularized Mahalanobis Metriccited by 41
  5. 2021ADePT: Auto-encoder based Differentially Private Text Transformationcited by 31
  6. 2020Towards Differentially Private Text Representationscited by 28
  7. 2022DP-Rewrite: Towards Reproducibility and Transparency in Differentially Private Text Rewritingcited by 28
  8. 2021When differential privacy meets NLP: The devil is in the detailcited by 25
  9. 2021CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learningcited by 22
  10. 2018SynTF: Synthetic and Differentially Private Term Frequency Vectors for Privacy-Preserving Text Miningcited by 20
  11. 2021On a Utilitarian Approach to Privacy Preserving Text Generationcited by 17
  12. 2022Fair NLP Models with Differentially Private Text Encoderscited by 9
  13. 2020Input Perturbation: A New Paradigm between Central and Local Differential Privacycited by 6
  14. 2021BRR: Preserving Privacy of Text Data Efficiently on Devicecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

11 papers.