Private Language Models via Truncated Laplacian Mechanism
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models for NLP tasks are prone to variants of privacy attacks. To prevent privacy leakage, researchers have investigated word-level perturbations, relying on the formal guarantees of differential privacy (DP) in the embedding space. However, many existing approaches either achieve unsatisfactory performance in the high privacy regime when using the Laplacian or Gaussian mechanism, or resort to weaker relaxations of DP that are inferior to the canonical DP in terms of privacy strength. This raises the question of whether a new method for private word embedding can be designed to overcome these limitations. In this paper, we propose a novel private embedding method called the high dimensional truncated Laplacian mechanism. Specifically, we introduce a non-trivial extension of the truncated Laplacian mechanism, which was previously only investigated in one-dimensional space cases. Theoretically, we show that our method has a lower variance compared to the previous private word embedding methods. To further validate its effectiveness, we conduct comprehensive experiments on private embedding and downstream tasks using three datasets. Remarkably, even in the high privacy regime, our approach only incurs a slight decrease in utility compared to the non-private scenario.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.
Builds on
40 of 68 references.
References · 40
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 127
- 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 115
- 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 115
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 94
28 more
- 2021Differential Privacy for Text Analytics via Natural Text Sanitizationcited by 74
- 2020Differentially Private Representation for NLP: Formal Guarantee and An Empirical Study on Privacy and Fairnesscited by 66
- 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2021Natural Language Understanding with Privacy-Preserving BERTcited by 54
- 2019Leveraging Hierarchical Representations for Preserving Privacy and Utility in Textcited by 49
- 2021TEM: High Utility Metric Differential Privacy on Textcited by 43
- 2021High Dimensional Differentially Private Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 42
- 2020A Differentially Private Text Perturbation Method Using a Regularized Mahalanobis Metriccited by 41
- 2021ADePT: Auto-encoder based Differentially Private Text Transformationcited by 31
- 2019No Training Required: Exploring Random Encoders for Sentence Classificationcited by 30
- 2020Towards Differentially Private Text Representationscited by 28
- 2022DP-Rewrite: Towards Reproducibility and Transparency in Differentially Private Text Rewritingcited by 28
- 2021When differential privacy meets NLP: The devil is in the detailcited by 25
- 2018Clinical Text Classification with Rule-based Features and Knowledge-guided Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2021CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learningcited by 22
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization in Non-interactive Local Differential Privacy: Efficiency and High Dimensional Casecited by 19
- 2023Practical Differentially Private and Byzantine-resilient Federated Learningcited by 18
- 2021On a Utilitarian Approach to Privacy Preserving Text Generationcited by 17
- 2020Empirical Risk Minimization in the Non-interactive Local Model of Differential Privacycited by 15
- 2023Guiding Text-to-Text Privatization by Syntaxcited by 14
- 2023Driving Context into Text-to-Text Privatizationcited by 13
- 2019Read, Attend and Comment: A Deep Architecture for Automatic News Comment Generationcited by 12
- 2021Faster Rates of Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 12
- 2024A Comparative Analysis of Word-Level Metric Differential Privacy: Benchmarking The Privacy-Utility Trade-offcited by 11
- 2022How reparametrization trick broke differentially-private text representation learningcited by 10
- 2019Estimating Smooth GLM in Non-interactive Local Differential Privacy Model with Public Unlabeled Datacited by 9
- 2021BRR: Preserving Privacy of Text Data Efficiently on Devicecited by 6
- 2021Learning Numeric Optimal Differentially Private Truncated Additive Mechanismscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.