mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sentiment-Aware Measure (SAM) for Evaluating Sentiment Transfer by Machine Translation Systems

arXiv 2109.14895 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In translating text where sentiment is the main message, human translators give particular attention to sentiment-carrying words. The reason is that an incorrect translation of such words would miss the fundamental aspect of the source text, i.e. the author's sentiment. In the online world, MT systems are extensively used to translate User-Generated Content (UGC) such as reviews, tweets, and social media posts, where the main message is often the author's positive or negative attitude towards the topic of the text. It is important in such scenarios to accurately measure how far an MT system can be a reliable real-life utility in transferring the correct affect message. This paper tackles an under-recognised problem in the field of machine translation evaluation which is judging to what extent automatic metrics concur with the gold standard of human evaluation for a correct translation of sentiment. We evaluate the efficacy of conventional quality metrics in spotting a mistranslation of sentiment, especially when it is the sole error in the MT output. We propose a numerical `sentiment-closeness' measure appropriate for assessing the accuracy of a translated affect message in UGC text by an MT system. We will show that incorporating this sentiment-aware measure can significantly enhance the correlation of some available quality metrics with the human judgement of an accurate translation of sentiment.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2021.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  6. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 158
  7. 2017WASSA-2017 Shared Task on Emotion Intensitycited by 38
  8. 2020Learning to Evaluate Translation Beyond English: BLEURT Submissions to the WMT Metrics 2020 Shared Taskcited by 25
  9. 2020Is it Great or Terrible? Preserving Sentiment in Neural Machine Translation of Arabic Reviewscited by 10
  10. 2015SentiWords: Deriving a High Precision and High Coverage Lexicon for Sentiment Analysiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.