Exploring the Linear Subspace Hypothesis in Gender Bias Mitigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bolukbasi et al. (2016) presents one of the first gender bias mitigation techniques for word representations. Their method takes pre-trained word representations as input and attempts to isolate a linear subspace that captures most of the gender bias in the representations. As judged by an analogical evaluation task, their method virtually eliminates gender bias in the representations. However, an implicit and untested assumption of their method is that the bias subspace is actually linear. In this work, we generalize their method to a kernelized, nonlinear version. We take inspiration from kernel principal component analysis and derive a nonlinear bias isolation technique. We discuss and overcome some of the practical drawbacks of our method for non-linear gender bias mitigation in word representations and analyze empirically whether the bias subspace is actually linear. Our analysis shows that gender bias is in fact well captured by a linear subspace, justifying the assumption of Bolukbasi et al. (2016).
Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
25 papers.
Sort:
- 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 98
- 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 47
- 2021The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representationscited by 39
- 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuningcited by 31
- 2021A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)cited by 23
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2024Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind Itcited by 22
- 2022Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projectioncited by 17
- 2021Assessing the Reliability of Word Embedding Gender Bias Measurescited by 14
- 2024Towards a theory of model distillationcited by 14
- 2024Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Modelscited by 13
- 2025Emergence of Linear Truth Encodings in Language Modelscited by 12
13 more
- 2024How Reliable are Causal Probing Interventions?cited by 9
- 2026The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and Steeringcited by 9
- 2021WordBias: An Interactive Visual Tool for Discovering Intersectional Biases Encoded in Word Embeddingscited by 8
- 2025Evolution of Concepts in Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 8
- 2023Removing Spurious Concepts from Neural Network Representations via Joint Subspace Estimationcited by 5
- 2021On a Benefit of Mask Language Modeling: Robustness to Simplicity Biascited by 4
- 2023Competence-Based Analysis of Language Modelscited by 4
- 2023This Reads Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Natural Language Processingcited by 2
- 2025Nonlinear Concept Erasure: a Density Matching Approachcited by 2
- 2022Unsupervised Detection of Contextualized Embedding Bias with Application to Ideologycited by 1
- 2023Towards Fair and Explainable AI using a Human-Centered AI Approachcited by 1
- 2025Do Large Language Models know who did what to whom?cited by 0
- 2026MUtE: A Dual Framework for Concept Erasure and Counterfactual Interventionscited by 0
- 2026MUtE: A Dual Framework for Concept Erasure and Counterfactual Interventions10 Sep 2026
- 2026The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and Steering17 Feb 2026
- 2025Emergence of Linear Truth Encodings in Language Models17 Oct 2025
- 2025Evolution of Concepts in Language Model Pre-Training21 Sep 2025
- 2025Nonlinear Concept Erasure: a Density Matching Approach16 Jul 2025
- 2025Do Large Language Models know who did what to whom?23 Apr 2025
- 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuning3 Apr 2025
- 2024Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It11 Nov 2024
- 2024Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Models11 Nov 2024
- 2024How Reliable are Causal Probing Interventions?28 Aug 2024
- 2024Towards a theory of model distillation14 Mar 2024
- 2023This Reads Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Natural Language Processing25 Oct 2023
13 more
- 2023Removing Spurious Concepts from Neural Network Representations via Joint Subspace Estimation18 Oct 2023
- 2023Towards Fair and Explainable AI using a Human-Centered AI Approach12 Jun 2023
- 2023Competence-Based Analysis of Language Models1 Mar 2023
- 2022Unsupervised Detection of Contextualized Embedding Bias with Application to Ideology14 Dec 2022
- 2022Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projection8 Dec 2022
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey10 Nov 2022
- 2022Kernelized Concept Erasure28 Jan 2022
- 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure28 Jan 2022
- 2021A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)7 Nov 2021
- 2021On a Benefit of Mask Language Modeling: Robustness to Simplicity Bias11 Oct 2021
- 2021Assessing the Reliability of Word Embedding Gender Bias Measures10 Sep 2021
- 2021The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representations15 May 2021
- 2021WordBias: An Interactive Visual Tool for Discovering Intersectional Biases Encoded in Word Embeddings5 Mar 2021
- 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 98
- 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 47
- 2021The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representationscited by 39
- 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuningcited by 31
- 2021A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)cited by 23
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2024Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind Itcited by 22
- 2022Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projectioncited by 17
- 2021Assessing the Reliability of Word Embedding Gender Bias Measurescited by 14
- 2024Towards a theory of model distillationcited by 14
- 2024Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Modelscited by 13
- 2025Emergence of Linear Truth Encodings in Language Modelscited by 12
12 most cited of 25 All 25 (JSON)
- 2026MUtE: A Dual Framework for Concept Erasure and Counterfactual Interventions10 Sep 2026
- 2026The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and Steering17 Feb 2026
- 2025Emergence of Linear Truth Encodings in Language Models17 Oct 2025
- 2025Evolution of Concepts in Language Model Pre-Training21 Sep 2025
- 2025Nonlinear Concept Erasure: a Density Matching Approach16 Jul 2025
- 2025Do Large Language Models know who did what to whom?23 Apr 2025
- 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuning3 Apr 2025
- 2024Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It11 Nov 2024
- 2024Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Models11 Nov 2024
- 2024How Reliable are Causal Probing Interventions?28 Aug 2024
- 2024Towards a theory of model distillation14 Mar 2024
- 2023This Reads Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Natural Language Processing25 Oct 2023
12 newest of 25 All 25 (JSON)