mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring the Linear Subspace Hypothesis in Gender Bias Mitigation

arXiv 2009.09435 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2020cs.LG cs.CL cs.CYcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bolukbasi et al. (2016) presents one of the first gender bias mitigation techniques for word representations. Their method takes pre-trained word representations as input and attempts to isolate a linear subspace that captures most of the gender bias in the representations. As judged by an analogical evaluation task, their method virtually eliminates gender bias in the representations. However, an implicit and untested assumption of their method is that the bias subspace is actually linear. In this work, we generalize their method to a kernelized, nonlinear version. We take inspiration from kernel principal component analysis and derive a nonlinear bias isolation technique. We discuss and overcome some of the practical drawbacks of our method for non-linear gender bias mitigation in word representations and analyze empirically whether the bias subspace is actually linear. Our analysis shows that gender bias is in fact well captured by a linear subspace, justifying the assumption of Bolukbasi et al. (2016).

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

25 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 98
  2. 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 47
  3. 2021The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representationscited by 39
  4. 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuningcited by 31
  5. 2021A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)cited by 23
  6. 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
  7. 2024Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind Itcited by 22
  8. 2022Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projectioncited by 17
  9. 2021Assessing the Reliability of Word Embedding Gender Bias Measurescited by 14
  10. 2024Towards a theory of model distillationcited by 14
  11. 2024Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Modelscited by 13
  12. 2025Emergence of Linear Truth Encodings in Language Modelscited by 12
13 more
  1. 2024How Reliable are Causal Probing Interventions?cited by 9
  2. 2026The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and Steeringcited by 9
  3. 2021WordBias: An Interactive Visual Tool for Discovering Intersectional Biases Encoded in Word Embeddingscited by 8
  4. 2025Evolution of Concepts in Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 8
  5. 2023Removing Spurious Concepts from Neural Network Representations via Joint Subspace Estimationcited by 5
  6. 2021On a Benefit of Mask Language Modeling: Robustness to Simplicity Biascited by 4
  7. 2023Competence-Based Analysis of Language Modelscited by 4
  8. 2023This Reads Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Natural Language Processingcited by 2
  9. 2025Nonlinear Concept Erasure: a Density Matching Approachcited by 2
  10. 2022Unsupervised Detection of Contextualized Embedding Bias with Application to Ideologycited by 1
  11. 2023Towards Fair and Explainable AI using a Human-Centered AI Approachcited by 1
  12. 2025Do Large Language Models know who did what to whom?cited by 0
  13. 2026MUtE: A Dual Framework for Concept Erasure and Counterfactual Interventionscited by 0