The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and Steering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper concerns the question of how AI systems encode semantic structure into the geometric structure of their representation spaces. The motivating observation is that the natural geometry of these representation spaces should reflect the way models use representations to produce behavior. We focus on the important special case of representations that define softmax distributions. In this case, we argue that the natural geometry is information geometry. Our focus is on the role of information geometry on semantic encoding and the linear representation hypothesis. As an illustrative application, we develop "dual steering", a method for robustly steering representations to exhibit a particular concept using linear probes. We prove that dual steering optimally modifies the target concept while minimizing changes to off-target concepts. Empirically, we find that dual steering enhances the controllability and stability of concept manipulation.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.
Builds on
56 of 66 references.
References · 56
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
38 more
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 302
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 254
- 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 240
- 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 237
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 199
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 189
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 173
- 2017Latent Space Oddity: on the Curvature of Deep Generative Modelscited by 169
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2023Linear Representations of Sentiment in Large Language Modelscited by 157
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2022Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Spacecited by 139
- 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 130
- 2025The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational Independencecited by 104
- 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 98
- 2017The Riemannian Geometry of Deep Generative Modelscited by 81
- 2018An elementary introduction to information geometrycited by 76
- 2024On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
- 2025Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling Recipecited by 59
- 2024What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? A Mechanistic Studycited by 54
- 2024Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine Steeringcited by 47
- 2025The Origins of Representation Manifolds in Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2020Geometrically Enriched Latent Spacescited by 45
- 2026When Models Manipulate Manifolds: The Geometry of a Counting Taskcited by 43
- 2024Interpreting the Second-Order Effects of Neurons in CLIPcited by 36
- 2022Interpreting Neural Networks through the Polytope Lenscited by 33
- 2024Towards Reliable Evaluation of Behavior Steering Interventions in LLMscited by 33
- 2020Exploring the Linear Subspace Hypothesis in Gender Bias Mitigationcited by 25
- 2021Pulling back information geometrycited by 23
50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?cited by 25
- 2026Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behaviorcited by 22
- 2026How Controllable Are Large Language Models? A Unified Evaluation across Behavioral Granularitiescited by 3
- 2026FishBack: Pullback Fisher Geometry for Optimal Activation Steering in Transformerscited by 3
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifoldscited by 3
- 2026Stream separation improves Bregman conditioning in transformerscited by 0
- 2026MAxBench: A Multinomial Concept Recovery Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026The Answer-Basin Representation Hypothesis: We Are Not Probing or Steering Conceptscited by 0
- 2026The Linear Representation Hypothesis for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 0
- 2026The Linear Representation Hypothesis for Vision-Language-Action Models25 Sep 2026
- 2026The Answer-Basin Representation Hypothesis: We Are Not Probing or Steering Concepts21 Sep 2026
- 2026MAxBench: A Multinomial Concept Recovery Benchmark11 Sep 2026
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds23 Jun 2026
- 2026FishBack: Pullback Fisher Geometry for Optimal Activation Steering in Transformers17 May 2026
- 2026Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior6 May 2026
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?30 Apr 2026
- 2026Stream separation improves Bregman conditioning in transformers22 Mar 2026
- 2026How Controllable Are Large Language Models? A Unified Evaluation across Behavioral Granularities3 Mar 2026