Nonlinear Concept Erasure: a Density Matching Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring that neural models used in real-world applications cannot infer sensitive information, such as demographic attributes like gender or race, from text representations is a critical challenge when fairness is a concern. We address this issue through concept erasure, a process that removes information related to a specific concept from distributed representations while preserving as much of the remaining semantic information as possible. Our approach involves learning an orthogonal projection in the embedding space, designed to make the class-conditional feature distributions of the discrete concept to erase indistinguishable after projection. By adjusting the rank of the projector, we control the extent of information removal, while its orthogonality ensures strict preservation of the local structure of the embeddings. Our method, termed overlineLEOPARD, achieves state-of-the-art performance in nonlinear erasure of a discrete attribute on classic natural language processing benchmarks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that overlineLEOPARD effectively mitigates bias in deep nonlinear classifiers, thereby promoting fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.
Builds on
24 of 30 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
- 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
- 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 257
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
- 2016Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American Englishcited by 196
- 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 170
12 more
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
- 2017Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for detecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasmcited by 118
- 2020CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Modelscited by 117
- 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 101
- 2021Causally motivated Shortcut Removal Using Auxiliary Labelscited by 55
- 2022CEBaB: Estimating the Causal Effects of Real-World Concepts on NLP Model Behaviorcited by 55
- 2024Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine Steeringcited by 50
- 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 48
- 2020Exploring the Linear Subspace Hypothesis in Gender Bias Mitigationcited by 25
- 2022Learning Fair Representations via Rate-Distortion Maximizationcited by 15
- 2023Robust Concept Erasure via Kernelized Rate-Distortion Maximizationcited by 11
- 2024Explaining Text Classifiers with Counterfactual Representationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.