mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Importance of Self-Consistency in Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation

arXiv 2008.01860 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2020cs.CVcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address the task of active learning in the context of semantic segmentation and show that self-consistency can be a powerful source of self-supervision to greatly improve the performance of a data-driven model with access to only a small amount of labeled data. Self-consistency uses the simple observation that the results of semantic segmentation for a specific image should not change under transformations like horizontal flipping (i.e., the results should only be flipped). In other words, the output of a model should be consistent under equivariant transformations. The self-supervisory signal of self-consistency is particularly helpful during active learning since the model is prone to overfitting when there is only a small amount of labeled training data. In our proposed active learning framework, we iteratively extract small image patches that need to be labeled, by selecting image patches that have high uncertainty (high entropy) under equivariant transformations. We enforce pixel-wise self-consistency between the outputs of segmentation network for each image and its transformation (horizontally flipped) to utilize the rich self-supervisory information and reduce the uncertainty of the network. In this way, we are able to find the image patches over which the current model struggles the most to classify. By iteratively training over these difficult image patches, our experiments show that our active learning approach reaches ~96% of the top performance of a model trained on all data, by using only 12% of the total data on benchmark semantic segmentation datasets (e.g., CamVid and Cityscapes).

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 6; 2023: 8; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021All you need are a few pixels: semantic segmentation with PixelPickcited by 30
  2. 2023Hyperbolic Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation under Domain Shiftcited by 18
  3. 2022Semantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 16
  4. 2021Class-Balanced Active Learning for Image Classificationcited by 15
  5. 2023Adaptive Superpixel for Active Learning in Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
  6. 2023Best Practices in Active Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 10
  7. 2023Multi-Task Consistency for Active Learningcited by 9
  8. 2023Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation with Multi-class Label Querycited by 9
  9. 2022Deep Active Learning for Computer Vision: Past and Futurecited by 7
  10. 2021MEAL: Manifold Embedding-based Active Learningcited by 5
  11. 2023Correlation-aware active learning for surgery video segmentationcited by 4
  12. 2022Self-supervised Learning for Panoptic Segmentation of Multiple Fruit Flower Speciescited by 3
9 more
  1. 2022Semantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 3
  2. 2022LiDAR dataset distillation within bayesian active learning framework: Understanding the effect of data augmentationcited by 2
  3. 2024Active Learning with Context Sampling and One-vs-Rest Entropy for Semantic Segmentationcited by 2
  4. 2022Tracking Passengers and Baggage Items using Multiple Overhead Cameras at Security Checkpointscited by 1
  5. 2021Embodied Learning for Lifelong Visual Perceptioncited by 0
  6. 2023Evaluating the effect of data augmentation and BALD heuristics on distillation of Semantic-KITTI datasetcited by 0
  7. 2023Maturity-Aware Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation with Hierarchically-Adaptive Sample Assessmentcited by 0
  8. 2024Key Patch Proposer: Key Patches Contain Rich Informationcited by 0
  9. 2026A Self Consistency Based Reranking for Narrative Question Answeringcited by 0