mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Best Practices in Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation

arXiv 2302.04075 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2023cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning is particularly of interest for semantic segmentation, where annotations are costly. Previous academic studies focused on datasets that are already very diverse and where the model is trained in a supervised manner with a large annotation budget. In contrast, data collected in many driving scenarios is highly redundant, and most medical applications are subject to very constrained annotation budgets. This work investigates the various types of existing active learning methods for semantic segmentation under diverse conditions across three dimensions - data distribution w.r.t. different redundancy levels, integration of semi-supervised learning, and different labeling budgets. We find that these three underlying factors are decisive for the selection of the best active learning approach. As an outcome of our study, we provide a comprehensive usage guide to obtain the best performance for each case. We also propose an exemplary evaluation task for driving scenarios, where data has high redundancy, to showcase the practical implications of our research findings.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  5. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  6. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  7. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
  8. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  9. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
  10. 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
  11. 2022Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labelscited by 218
  12. 2020A2D2: Audi Autonomous Driving Datasetcited by 189
15 more
  1. 2016Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognitioncited by 184
  2. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
  3. 2019Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with High- and Low-level Consistencycited by 147
  4. 2019Consistency-based Semi-supervised Active Learning: Towards Minimizing Labeling Costcited by 114
  5. 2019Deep Active Learning: Unified and Principled Method for Query and Trainingcited by 92
  6. 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 88
  7. 2020Task-Aware Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 84
  8. 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 53
  9. 2021Semi-Supervised Active Learning with Temporal Output Discrepancycited by 50
  10. 2018CEREALS - Cost-Effective REgion-based Active Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 47
  11. 2019Parting with Illusions about Deep Active Learningcited by 38
  12. 2021All you need are a few pixels: semantic segmentation with PixelPickcited by 30
  13. 2020Importance of Self-Consistency in Active Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 21
  14. 2019Active and Semi-Supervised Learning in ASR: Benefits on the Acoustic and Language Modelscited by 16
  15. 2022Semantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.