mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Modeling for Named Entities and Morphology (NEMO^2)

arXiv 2007.15620 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2020cs.CLcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is a fundamental NLP task, commonly formulated as classification over a sequence of tokens. Morphologically-Rich Languages (MRLs) pose a challenge to this basic formulation, as the boundaries of Named Entities do not necessarily coincide with token boundaries, rather, they respect morphological boundaries. To address NER in MRLs we then need to answer two fundamental questions, namely, what are the basic units to be labeled, and how can these units be detected and classified in realistic settings, i.e., where no gold morphology is available. We empirically investigate these questions on a novel NER benchmark, with parallel tokenlevel and morpheme-level NER annotations, which we develop for Modern Hebrew, a morphologically rich-and-ambiguous language. Our results show that explicitly modeling morphological boundaries leads to improved NER performance, and that a novel hybrid architecture, in which NER precedes and prunes morphological decomposition, greatly outperforms the standard pipeline, where morphological decomposition strictly precedes NER, setting a new performance bar for both Hebrew NER and Hebrew morphological decomposition tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wildcited by 39
  2. 2021AlephBERT:A Hebrew Large Pre-Trained Language Model to Start-off your Hebrew NLP Application Withcited by 28
  3. 2023DictaBERT: A State-of-the-Art BERT Suite for Modern Hebrewcited by 17
  4. 2021HeBERT & HebEMO: a Hebrew BERT Model and a Tool for Polarity Analysis and Emotion Recognitioncited by 14
  5. 2022Large Pre-Trained Models with Extra-Large Vocabularies: A Contrastive Analysis of Hebrew BERT Models and a New One to Outperform Them Allcited by 14
  6. 2022Breaking Character: Are Subwords Good Enough for MRLs After All?cited by 13
  7. 2021ParaShoot: A Hebrew Question Answering Datasetcited by 12
  8. 2023HeRo: RoBERTa and Longformer Hebrew Language Modelscited by 12
  9. 2024HeSum: a Novel Dataset for Abstractive Text Summarization in Hebrewcited by 6
  10. 2025Splintering Nonconcatenative Languages for Better Tokenizationcited by 6
  11. 2023Explicit Morphological Knowledge Improves Pre-training of Language Models for Hebrewcited by 5
  12. 2022Neural Token Segmentation for High Token-Internal Complexitycited by 4
14 more
  1. 2023Enriching the NArabizi Treebank: A Multifaceted Approach to Supporting an Under-Resourced Languagecited by 4
  2. 2022Multilingual Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Hebrew NLPcited by 3
  3. 2024MRL Parsing Without Tears: The Case of Hebrewcited by 3
  4. 2024OpenNER 1.0: Standardized Open-Access Named Entity Recognition Datasets in 50+ Languagescited by 2
  5. 2023Introducing DictaLM -- A Large Generative Language Model for Modern Hebrewcited by 1
  6. 2025NeoDictaBERT: Pushing the Frontier of BERT models for Hebrewcited by 1
  7. 2025HalleluBERT: Let Every Token That Has Meaning Bear Its Weightcited by 1
  8. 2023Samsung R&D Institute Philippines at WMT 2023cited by 0
  9. 2024Mevaker: Conclusion Extraction and Allocation Resources for the Hebrew Languagecited by 0
  10. 2025Incentivizing High-Quality Human Annotations with Golden Questionscited by 0
  11. 2025Users as Annotators: LLM Preference Learning from Comparison Modecited by 0
  12. 2026Beyond Word Boundaries: A Hebrew Coreference Benchmark and an Evaluation Protocol for Morphologically Complex Textcited by 0
  13. 2026Who Gets Named: Citation Type Predicts Individual Naming by Grounded Language Models, and a Roster Instrument Captures 0.5% of Itcited by 0
  14. 2026LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judgescited by 0