Unraveling the Interconnected Axes of Heterogeneity in Machine Learning for Democratic and Inclusive Advancements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing utilization of machine learning (ML) in decision-making processes raises questions about its benefits to society. In this study, we identify and analyze three axes of heterogeneity that significantly influence the trajectory of ML products. These axes are i) values, culture and regulations, ii) data composition, and iii) resource and infrastructure capacity. We demonstrate how these axes are interdependent and mutually influence one another, emphasizing the need to consider and address them jointly. Unfortunately, the current research landscape falls short in this regard, often failing to adopt a holistic approach. We examine the prevalent practices and methodologies that skew these axes in favor of a selected few, resulting in power concentration, homogenized control, and increased dependency. We discuss how this fragmented study of the three axes poses a significant challenge, leading to an impractical solution space that lacks reflection of real-world scenarios. Addressing these issues is crucial to ensure a more comprehensive understanding of the interconnected nature of society and to foster the democratic and inclusive development of ML systems that are more aligned with real-world complexities and its diverse requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2023.
Builds on
50 of 105 references.
References · 50
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
38 more
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 391
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
- 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287
- 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 226
- 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
- 2021Federated Multi-Task Learning under a Mixture of Distributionscited by 189
- 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
- 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
- 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
- 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 137
- 2019BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 115
- 2022Plex: Towards Reliability using Pretrained Large Model Extensionscited by 102
- 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 100
- 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
- 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
- 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
- 2020Robust Fairness under Covariate Shiftcited by 58
- 2017A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Marketcited by 44
- 2019Transfer of Machine Learning Fairness across Domainscited by 36
- 2017Society-in-the-Loop: Programming the Algorithmic Social Contractcited by 35
- 2020FAE: A Fairness-Aware Ensemble Frameworkcited by 34
- 2020Algorithmic Fairness from a Non-ideal Perspectivecited by 30
- 2021Training Fair Models in Federated Learning without Data Privacy Infringementcited by 26
- 2020Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer Visioncited by 25
- 2020The Limits of Differential Privacy (and its Misuse in Data Release and Machine Learning)cited by 22
- 2021Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learningcited by 17
- 2020Affirmative Algorithms: The Legal Grounds for Fairness as Awarenesscited by 15
- 2019Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination Patternscited by 14
- 2021Narratives and Counternarratives on Data Sharing in Africacited by 14
- 2020Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 13
- 2020The Impossibility Theorem of Machine Fairness -- A Causal Perspectivecited by 13
- 2022Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorizationcited by 10
- 2022Privacy Meets Explainability: A Comprehensive Impact Benchmarkcited by 9
- 2021FRL: Federated Rank Learningcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.