mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-tokamak Disruption Prediction based on Physics-Guided Feature Extraction and domain adaptation

arXiv 2309.05361 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2023physics.plasm-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The high acquisition cost and the significant demand for disruptive discharges for data-driven disruption prediction models in future tokamaks pose an inherent contradiction in disruption prediction research. In this paper, we demonstrated a novel approach to predict disruption in a future tokamak using only a few discharges. The first step is to use the existing understanding of physics to extract physics-guided features from the diagnostic signals of each tokamak, called physics-guided feature extraction (PGFE). The second step is to align a few data from the future tokamak (target domain) and a large amount of data from existing tokamak (source domain) based on a domain adaptation algorithm called CORrelation ALignment (CORAL). It is the first attempt at applying domain adaptation in the task of disruption prediction. PGFE has been successfully applied in J-TEXT to predict disruption with excellent performance. PGFE can also reduce the data volume requirements due to extracting the less device-specific features, thereby establishing a solid foundation for cross-tokamak disruption prediction. We have further improved CORAL (supervised CORAL, S-CORAL) to enhance its appropriateness in feature alignment for the disruption prediction task. To simulate the existing and future tokamak case, we selected J-TEXT as the existing tokamak and EAST as the future tokamak, which has a large gap in the ranges of plasma parameters. The utilization of the S-CORAL improves the disruption prediction performance on future tokamak. Through interpretable analysis, we discovered that the learned knowledge of the disruption prediction model through this approach exhibits more similarities to the model trained on large data volumes of future tokamak.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2023.

Builds on

12 of 58 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
  3. 2015Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptationcited by 391
  4. 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
  5. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 238
  6. 2020Neural Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in NLP---A Surveycited by 144
  7. 2020Hybrid deep learning architecture for general disruption prediction across tokamakscited by 17
  8. 2015DART: Dropouts meet Multiple Additive Regression Treescited by 15
  9. 2019Different Set Domain Adaptation for Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Label Alignment Approachcited by 11
  10. 2021Scenario adaptive disruption prediction study for next generation burning-plasma tokamakscited by 5
  11. 2022IDP-PGFE: An Interpretable Disruption Predictor based on Physics-Guided Feature Extractioncited by 3
  12. 2022Transferable Cross-Tokamak Disruption Prediction with Deep Hybrid Neural Network Feature Extractorcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.