mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Continuous Convolutional Neural Networks for Disruption Prediction in Nuclear Fusion Plasmas

arXiv 2312.01286 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2023cs.LG physics.plasm-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grid decarbonization for climate change requires dispatchable carbon-free energy like nuclear fusion. The tokamak concept offers a promising path for fusion, but one of the foremost challenges in implementation is the occurrence of energetic plasma disruptions. In this study, we delve into Machine Learning approaches to predict plasma state outcomes. Our contributions are twofold: (1) We present a novel application of Continuous Convolutional Neural Networks for disruption prediction and (2) We examine the advantages and disadvantages of continuous models over discrete models for disruption prediction by comparing our model with the previous, discrete state of the art, and show that continuous models offer significantly better performance (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve = 0.974 v.s. 0.799) with fewer parameters

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2023.

Builds on

6 of 14 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
  2. 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 696
  3. 2021FlexConv: Continuous Kernel Convolutions with Differentiable Kernel Sizescited by 66
  4. 2023Modelling Long Range Dependencies in ND: From Task-Specific to a General Purpose CNNcited by 18
  5. 2020Hybrid deep learning architecture for general disruption prediction across tokamakscited by 17
  6. 2022A general framework for quantifying uncertainty at scalecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.