mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CheXpert++: Approximating the CheXpert labeler for Speed,Differentiability, and Probabilistic Output

arXiv 2006.15229 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is often infeasible or impossible to obtain ground truth labels for medical data. To circumvent this, one may build rule-based or other expert-knowledge driven labelers to ingest data and yield silver labels absent any ground-truth training data. One popular such labeler is CheXpert, a labeler that produces diagnostic labels for chest X-ray radiology reports. CheXpert is very useful, but is relatively computationally slow, especially when integrated with end-to-end neural pipelines, is non-differentiable so can't be used in any applications that require gradients to flow through the labeler, and does not yield probabilistic outputs, which limits our ability to improve the quality of the silver labeler through techniques such as active learning. In this work, we solve all three of these problems with textttCheXpert++, a BERT-based, high-fidelity approximation to CheXpert. textttCheXpert++ achieves 99.81% parity with CheXpert, which means it can be reliably used as a drop-in replacement for CheXpert, all while being significantly faster, fully differentiable, and probabilistic in output. Error analysis of textttCheXpert++ also demonstrates that textttCheXpert++ has a tendency to actually correct errors in the CheXpert labels, with textttCheXpert++ labels being more often preferred by a clinician over CheXpert labels (when they disagree) on all but one disease task. To further demonstrate the utility of these advantages in this model, we conduct a proof-of-concept active learning study, demonstrating we can improve accuracy on an expert labeled random subset of report sentences by approximately 8% over raw, unaltered CheXpert by using one-iteration of active-learning inspired re-training. These findings suggest that simple techniques in co-learning and active learning can yield high-quality labelers under minimal, and controllable human labeling demands.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021RadGraph: Extracting Clinical Entities and Relations from Radiology Reportscited by 310
  2. 2023MedKLIP: Medical Knowledge Enhanced Language-Image Pre-Training in Radiologycited by 149
  3. 2023Knowledge-enhanced Visual-Language Pre-training on Chest Radiology Imagescited by 128
  4. 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
  5. 2021VisualCheXbert: Addressing the Discrepancy Between Radiology Report Labels and Image Labelscited by 27
  6. 2023Continual Learning in Medical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advancements and Future Prospectscited by 22
  7. 2021CLIP: A Dataset for Extracting Action Items for Physicians from Hospital Discharge Notescited by 18
  8. 2023Synthetically Enhanced: Unveiling Synthetic Data's Potential in Medical Imaging Researchcited by 18
  9. 2023UniBrain: Universal Brain MRI Diagnosis with Hierarchical Knowledge-enhanced Pre-trainingcited by 13
  10. 2023RadGraph2: Modeling Disease Progression in Radiology Reports via Hierarchical Information Extractioncited by 11
  11. 2024Uncovering Knowledge Gaps in Radiology Report Generation Models through Knowledge Graphscited by 7
  12. 2022Learning to diagnose common thorax diseases on chest radiographs from radiology reports in Vietnamesecited by 5
11 more
  1. 2021Leveraging Deep Representations of Radiology Reports in Survival Analysis for Predicting Heart Failure Patient Mortalitycited by 3
  2. 2025CoRPA: Adversarial Image Generation for Chest X-rays Using Concept Vector Perturbations and Generative Modelscited by 3
  3. 2021Making Document-Level Information Extraction Right for the Right Reasonscited by 2
  4. 2024Leveraging Expert Input for Robust and Explainable AI-Assisted Lung Cancer Detection in Chest X-rayscited by 2
  5. 2025A Reality Check of Vision-Language Pre-training in Radiology: Have We Progressed Using Text?cited by 2
  6. 2025Limitations of Public Chest Radiography Datasets for Artificial Intelligence: Label Quality, Domain Shift, Bias and Evaluation Challengescited by 2
  7. 2022Improving Chest X-Ray Classification by RNN-based Patient Monitoringcited by 1
  8. 2026Radiologist-Guided Causal Concept Bottleneck Models for Chest X-Ray Interpretationcited by 1
  9. 2024A Disease Labeler for Chinese Chest X-Ray Report Generationcited by 0
  10. 2025Can Modern NLP Systems Reliably Annotate Chest Radiography Exams? A Pre-Purchase Evaluation and Comparative Study of Solutions from AWS, Google, Azure, John Snow Labs, and Open-Source Models on an Independent Pediatric Datasetcited by 0
  11. 2026Clinically Aware Synthetic Image Generation for Concept Coverage in Chest X-ray Modelscited by 0