mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Fairness in Personalized Ads Using Impression Variance Aware Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2306.03293 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.AI cs.CYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Variances in ad impression outcomes across demographic groups are increasingly considered to be potentially indicative of algorithmic bias in personalized ads systems. While there are many definitions of fairness that could be applicable in the context of personalized systems, we present a framework which we call the Variance Reduction System (VRS) for achieving more equitable outcomes in Meta's ads systems. VRS seeks to achieve a distribution of impressions with respect to selected protected class (PC) attributes that more closely aligns the demographics of an ad's eligible audience (a function of advertiser targeting criteria) with the audience who sees that ad, in a privacy-preserving manner. We first define metrics to quantify fairness gaps in terms of ad impression variances with respect to PC attributes including gender and estimated race. We then present the VRS for re-ranking ads in an impression variance-aware manner. We evaluate VRS via extensive simulations over different parameter choices and study the effect of the VRS on the chosen fairness metric. We finally present online A/B testing results from applying VRS to Meta's ads systems, concluding with a discussion of future work. We have deployed the VRS to all users in the US for housing ads, resulting in significant improvement in our fairness metric. VRS is the first large-scale deployed framework for pursuing fairness for multiple PC attributes in online advertising.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  4. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  5. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  6. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  7. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  8. 2018RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewardscited by 162
  9. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  10. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
  11. 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
  12. 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
9 more
  1. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  2. 2017From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classificationcited by 60
  3. 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
  4. 2020Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Feedbackcited by 40
  5. 2021Learning Long-Term Reward Redistribution via Randomized Return Decompositioncited by 33
  6. 2022Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off inRecommendation through Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  7. 2021Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominancecited by 28
  8. 2019Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomescited by 15
  9. 2020Towards Threshold Invariant Fair Classificationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.