A Canonical Data Transformation for Achieving Inter- and Within-group Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Increases in the deployment of machine learning algorithms for applications that deal with sensitive data have brought attention to the issue of fairness in machine learning. Many works have been devoted to applications that require different demographic groups to be treated fairly. However, algorithms that aim to satisfy inter-group fairness (also called group fairness) may inadvertently treat individuals within the same demographic group unfairly. To address this issue, we introduce a formal definition of within-group fairness that maintains fairness among individuals from within the same group. We propose a pre-processing framework to meet both inter- and within-group fairness criteria with little compromise in accuracy. The framework maps the feature vectors of members from different groups to an inter-group-fair canonical domain before feeding them into a scoring function. The mapping is constructed to preserve the relative relationship between the scores obtained from the unprocessed feature vectors of individuals from the same demographic group, guaranteeing within-group fairness. We apply this framework to the COMPAS risk assessment and Law School datasets and compare its performance in achieving inter-group and within-group fairness to two regularization-based methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.
Builds on
26 of 56 references.
References · 26
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
- 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
14 more
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 99
- 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
- 2020Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from Datacited by 54
- 2019Metric Learning for Individual Fairnesscited by 51
- 2016Squared Earth Mover's Distance-based Loss for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 45
- 2019An Algorithmic Framework for Fairness Elicitationcited by 15
- 2022Pushing the limits of fairness impossibility: Who's the fairest of them all?cited by 15
- 2020Towards Threshold Invariant Fair Classificationcited by 12
- 2021Attributing Fair Decisions with Attention Interventionscited by 10
- 2020Hiring Fairly in the Age of Algorithmscited by 4
- 2020Transparency Tools for Fairness in AI (Luskin)cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.