mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Design Choices for X-vector Based Speaker Anonymization

arXiv 2005.08601 ↗First posted 18 May 2020eess.AS cs.CLcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recently proposed x-vector based anonymization scheme converts any input voice into that of a random pseudo-speaker. In this paper, we present a flexible pseudo-speaker selection technique as a baseline for the first VoicePrivacy Challenge. We explore several design choices for the distance metric between speakers, the region of x-vector space where the pseudo-speaker is picked, and gender selection. To assess the strength of anonymization achieved, we consider attackers using an x-vector based speaker verification system who may use original or anonymized speech for enrollment, depending on their knowledge of the anonymization scheme. The Equal Error Rate (EER) achieved by the attackers and the decoding Word Error Rate (WER) over anonymized data are reported as the measures of privacy and utility. Experiments are performed using datasets derived from LibriSpeech to find the optimal combination of design choices in terms of privacy and utility.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 8; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

27 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021The VoicePrivacy 2020 Challenge: Results and findingscited by 45
  2. 2024The VoicePrivacy 2024 Challenge Evaluation Plancited by 39
  3. 2022Anonymizing Speech with Generative Adversarial Networks to Preserve Speaker Privacycited by 20
  4. 2022The VoicePrivacy 2022 Challenge Evaluation Plancited by 18
  5. 2022Differentially Private Speaker Anonymizationcited by 16
  6. 2022A Review of Speech-centric Trustworthy Machine Learning: Privacy, Safety, and Fairnesscited by 13
  7. 2022Improving speaker de-identification with functional data analysis of f0 trajectoriescited by 11
  8. 2024The Impact of Speech Anonymization on Pathology and Its Limitscited by 11
  9. 2024End-to-end streaming model for low-latency speech anonymizationcited by 9
  10. 2026The Third VoicePrivacy Challenge: Preserving Emotional Expressiveness and Linguistic Content in Voice Anonymizationcited by 8
  11. 2021Configurable Privacy-Preserving Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 7
  12. 2024A Benchmark for Multi-speaker Anonymizationcited by 7
15 more
  1. 2025DarkStream: real-time speech anonymization with low latencycited by 6
  2. 2021Protecting gender and identity with disentangled speech representationscited by 5
  3. 2022The effect of speech pathology on automatic speaker verification -- a large-scale studycited by 5
  4. 2025Children's Voice Privacy: First Steps And Emerging Challengescited by 5
  5. 2023Introducing Model Inversion Attacks on Automatic Speaker Recognitioncited by 4
  6. 2026TVTSyn: Content-Synchronous Time-Varying Timbre for Streaming Voice Conversion and Anonymizationcited by 4
  7. 2021Evaluating X-vector-based Speaker Anonymization under White-box Assessmentcited by 1
  8. 2022DeID-VC: Speaker De-identification via Zero-shot Pseudo Voice Conversioncited by 1
  9. 2023On the Impact of Voice Anonymization on Speech Diagnostic Applications: a Case Study on COVID-19 Detectioncited by 1
  10. 2025SEF-MK: Speaker-Embedding-Free Voice Anonymization through Multi-k-means Quantizationcited by 1
  11. 2022Privacy-Utility Balanced Voice De-Identification Using Adversarial Examplescited by 0
  12. 2025Perceptual implications of automatic anonymization in pathological speechcited by 0
  13. 2026StreamVoiceAnon+: Emotion-Preserving Streaming Speaker Anonymization via Frame-Level Acoustic Distillationcited by 0
  14. 2026PHONOS: PHOnetic Neutralization for Online Streaming Applicationscited by 0
  15. 2026Anonymization, Not Elimination: Utility-Preserved Speech Anonymizationcited by 0