mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

iSEA: An Interactive Pipeline for Semantic Error Analysis of NLP Models

arXiv 2203.04408 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.HC cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Error analysis in NLP models is essential to successful model development and deployment. One common approach for diagnosing errors is to identify subpopulations in the dataset where the model produces the most errors. However, existing approaches typically define subpopulations based on pre-defined features, which requires users to form hypotheses of errors in advance. To complement these approaches, we propose iSEA, an Interactive Pipeline for Semantic Error Analysis in NLP Models, which automatically discovers semantically-grounded subpopulations with high error rates in the context of a human-in-the-loop interactive system. iSEA enables model developers to learn more about their model errors through discovered subpopulations, validate the sources of errors through interactive analysis on the discovered subpopulations, and test hypotheses about model errors by defining custom subpopulations. The tool supports semantic descriptions of error-prone subpopulations at the token and concept level, as well as pre-defined higher-level features. Through use cases and expert interviews, we demonstrate how iSEA can assist error understanding and analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  6. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  7. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  8. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  9. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
  10. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
  11. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  12. 2020Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Biascited by 183
9 more
  1. 2019Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 134
  2. 2020The Language Interpretability Tool: Extensible, Interactive Visualizations and Analysis for NLP Modelscited by 125
  3. 2021Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscapecited by 107
  4. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  5. 2018Automated Data Slicing for Model Validation:A Big data - AI Integration Approachcited by 70
  6. 2017Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?cited by 61
  7. 2018Manifold: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Interpretation and Diagnosis of Machine Learning Modelscited by 50
  8. 2017Stochastic Answer Networks for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 22
  9. 2020CrossCheck: Rapid, Reproducible, and Interpretable Model Evaluationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.