mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Marginal Thresholding in Noisy Image Segmentation

arXiv 2304.04116 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work presents a study on label noise in medical image segmentation by considering a noise model based on Gaussian field deformations. Such noise is of interest because it yields realistic looking segmentations and because it is unbiased in the sense that the expected deformation is the identity mapping. Efficient methods for sampling and closed form solutions for the marginal probabilities are provided. Moreover, theoretically optimal solutions to the loss functions cross-entropy and soft-Dice are studied and it is shown how they diverge as the level of noise increases. Based on recent work on loss function characterization, it is shown that optimal solutions to soft-Dice can be recovered by thresholding solutions to cross-entropy with a particular a priori unknown threshold that efficiently can be computed. This raises the question whether the decrease in performance seen when using cross-entropy as compared to soft-Dice is caused by using the wrong threshold. The hypothesis is validated in 5-fold studies on three organ segmentation problems from the TotalSegmentor data set, using 4 different strengths of noise. The results show that changing the threshold leads the performance of cross-entropy to go from systematically worse than soft-Dice to similar or better results than soft-Dice.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2023.

Builds on

20 of 35 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
  3. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  4. 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
  5. 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 163
  6. 2019Optimizing the Dice Score and Jaccard Index for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory & Practicecited by 71
  7. 2020SoftSeg: Advantages of soft versus binary training for image segmentationcited by 26
  8. 2019Learning to Segment Skin Lesions from Noisy Annotationscited by 25
  9. 2020Post Training Uncertainty Calibration of Deep Networks For Medical Image Segmentationcited by 19
  10. 2021Using Soft Labels to Model Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 18
  11. 2018Imperfect Segmentation Labels: How Much Do They Matter?cited by 14
  12. 2022Label fusion and training methods for reliable representation of inter-rater uncertaintycited by 13
8 more
  1. 2019Soft labeling by Distilling Anatomical knowledge for Improved MS Lesion Segmentationcited by 11
  2. 2021On the relationship between calibrated predictors and unbiased volume estimationcited by 11
  3. 2021Label noise in segmentation networks : mitigation must deal with biascited by 10
  4. 2020Robustness study of noisy annotation in deep learning based medical image segmentationcited by 9
  5. 2020Superpixel-Guided Label Softening for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 6
  6. 2022On Image Segmentation With Noisy Labels: Characterization and Volume Properties of the Optimal Solutions to Accuracy and Dicecited by 6
  7. 2022Theoretical analysis and experimental validation of volume bias of soft Dice optimized segmentation maps in the context of inherent uncertaintycited by 6
  8. 2023Noisy Image Segmentation With Soft-Dicecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.