Error bounds in estimating the out-of-sample prediction error using leave-one-out cross validation in high-dimensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of out-of-sample risk estimation in the high dimensional regime where both the sample size n and number of features p are large, and n/p can be less than one. Extensive empirical evidence confirms the accuracy of leave-one-out cross validation (LO) for out-of-sample risk estimation. Yet, a unifying theoretical evaluation of the accuracy of LO in high-dimensional problems has remained an open problem. This paper aims to fill this gap for penalized regression in the generalized linear family. With minor assumptions about the data generating process, and without any sparsity assumptions on the regression coefficients, our theoretical analysis obtains finite sample upper bounds on the expected squared error of LO in estimating the out-of-sample error. Our bounds show that the error goes to zero as n,p rightarrow ∞, even when the dimension p of the feature vectors is comparable with or greater than the sample size n. One technical advantage of the theory is that it can be used to clarify and connect some results from the recent literature on scalable approximate LO.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023Subsample Ridge Ensembles: Equivalences and Generalized Cross-Validationcited by 11
- 2021Derivatives and residual distribution of regularized M-estimators with application to adaptive tuningcited by 7
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional Settingscited by 5
- 2025Certified Data Removal Under High-dimensional Settingscited by 5
- 2023Extrapolated cross-validation for randomized ensemblescited by 4
- 2024Failures and Successes of Cross-Validation for Early-Stopped Gradient Descentcited by 4
- 2023Approximate Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Regression with ℓ1 Regularizers (extended version)cited by 3
- 2025Newfluence: Boosting Model interpretability and Understanding in High Dimensionscited by 2
- 2025Simultaneous analysis of approximate leave-one-out cross-validation and mean-field inferencecited by 1
- 2025Evaluation and Optimization of Leave-one-out Cross-validation for the Lassocited by 0
- 2026Accelerating Conformal Prediction via Approximate Leave-One-Outcited by 0
- 2026Accelerating Conformal Prediction via Approximate Leave-One-Out30 Jun 2026
- 2025Evaluation and Optimization of Leave-one-out Cross-validation for the Lasso20 Aug 2025
- 2025Newfluence: Boosting Model interpretability and Understanding in High Dimensions16 Jul 2025
- 2025Certified Data Removal Under High-dimensional Settings12 May 2025
- 2025Simultaneous analysis of approximate leave-one-out cross-validation and mean-field inference5 Jan 2025
- 2024Failures and Successes of Cross-Validation for Early-Stopped Gradient Descent26 Feb 2024
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional Settings13 Feb 2024
- 2023Approximate Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Regression with ℓ1 Regularizers (extended version)26 Oct 2023
- 2023Subsample Ridge Ensembles: Equivalences and Generalized Cross-Validation25 Apr 2023
- 2023Extrapolated cross-validation for randomized ensembles27 Feb 2023
- 2021Derivatives and residual distribution of regularized M-estimators with application to adaptive tuning11 Jul 2021