mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extrapolated cross-validation for randomized ensembles

arXiv 2302.13511 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2023stat.ME stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensemble methods such as bagging and random forests are ubiquitous in various fields, from finance to genomics. Despite their prevalence, the question of the efficient tuning of ensemble parameters has received relatively little attention. This paper introduces a cross-validation method, ECV (Extrapolated Cross-Validation), for tuning the ensemble and subsample sizes in randomized ensembles. Our method builds on two primary ingredients: initial estimators for small ensemble sizes using out-of-bag errors and a novel risk extrapolation technique that leverages the structure of prediction risk decomposition. By establishing uniform consistency of our risk extrapolation technique over ensemble and subsample sizes, we show that ECV yields δ-optimal (with respect to the oracle-tuned risk) ensembles for squared prediction risk. Our theory accommodates general ensemble predictors, only requires mild moment assumptions, and allows for high-dimensional regimes where the feature dimension grows with the sample size. As a practical case study, we employ ECV to predict surface protein abundances from gene expressions in single-cell multiomics using random forests. In comparison to sample-split cross-validation and K-fold cross-validation, ECV achieves higher accuracy avoiding sample splitting. At the same time, its computational cost is considerably lower owing to the use of the risk extrapolation technique. Additional numerical results validate the finite-sample accuracy of ECV for several common ensemble predictors under a computational constraint on the maximum ensemble size.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2023.

Builds on

20 of 65 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
  2. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  3. 2019Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions--a surveycited by 136
  4. 2014Consistency of random forestscited by 85
  5. 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
  6. 2020Multiple Descent: Design Your Own Generalization Curvecited by 45
  7. 2013Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknifecited by 44
  8. 2020Cross-validation Confidence Intervals for Test Errorcited by 33
  9. 2019The Implicit Regularization of Ordinary Least Squares Ensemblescited by 25
  10. 2019Asymptotic Distributions and Rates of Convergence for Random Forests via Generalized U-statisticscited by 18
  11. 2018Approximate Leave-One-Out for Fast Parameter Tuning in High Dimensionscited by 15
  12. 2017Cross-Validation with Confidencecited by 14
8 more
  1. 2020Approximate Cross-validation: Guarantees for Model Assessment and Selectioncited by 14
  2. 2020Error bounds in estimating the out-of-sample prediction error using leave-one-out cross validation in high-dimensionscited by 11
  3. 2022Bagging in overparameterized learning: Risk characterization and risk monotonizationcited by 11
  4. 2016Stability revisited: new generalisation bounds for the Leave-one-Outcited by 10
  5. 2019Estimating the Algorithmic Variance of Randomized Ensembles via the Bootstrapcited by 10
  6. 2022Mitigating multiple descents: A model-agnostic framework for risk monotonizationcited by 10
  7. 2019Measuring the Algorithmic Convergence of Randomized Ensembles: The Regression Settingcited by 5
  8. 2018Reducing Sampling Ratios Improves Bagging in Sparse Regressioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.