Newfluence: Boosting Model interpretability and Understanding in High Dimensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing complexity of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models has created a pressing need for tools that help scientists, engineers, and policymakers interpret and refine model decisions and predictions. Influence functions, originating from robust statistics, have emerged as a popular approach for this purpose. However, the heuristic foundations of influence functions rely on low-dimensional assumptions where the number of parameters p is much smaller than the number of observations n. In contrast, modern AI models often operate in high-dimensional regimes with large p, challenging these assumptions. In this paper, we examine the accuracy of influence functions in high-dimensional settings. Our theoretical and empirical analyses reveal that influence functions cannot reliably fulfill their intended purpose. We then introduce an alternative approximation, called Newfluence, that maintains similar computational efficiency while offering significantly improved accuracy. Newfluence is expected to provide more accurate insights than many existing methods for interpreting complex AI models and diagnosing their issues. Moreover, the high-dimensional framework we develop in this paper can also be applied to analyze other popular techniques, such as Shapley values.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.
Builds on
23 of 33 references.
References · 23
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
- 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 165
- 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 144
- 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 135
11 more
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 98
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 81
- 2023Simfluence: Modeling the Influence of Individual Training Examples by Simulating Training Runscited by 53
- 2024Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influencecited by 35
- 2023Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Docited by 29
- 2017The Likelihood Ratio Test in High-Dimensional Logistic Regression Is Asymptotically a Rescaled Chi-Squarecited by 15
- 2018Approximate Leave-One-Out for Fast Parameter Tuning in High Dimensionscited by 15
- 2020Error bounds in estimating the out-of-sample prediction error using leave-one-out cross validation in high-dimensionscited by 11
- 2025Understanding Impact of Human Feedback via Influence Functionscited by 11
- 2024Correcting Large Language Model Behavior via Influence Functioncited by 9
- 2025Certified Data Removal Under High-dimensional Settingscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026Market Design for AI: Beyond the Copyright Binary10 Jun 2026
- 2025Targeted Fine-Tuning of DNN-Based Receivers via Influence Functions19 Sep 2025