mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReLE: A Scalable System and Structured Benchmark for Diagnosing Capability Anisotropy in Chinese LLMs

arXiv 2601.17399 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved rapid progress in Chinese language understanding, yet accurately evaluating their capabilities remains challenged by benchmark saturation and prohibitive computational costs. While static leaderboards provide snapshot rankings, they often mask the structural trade-offs between capabilities. In this work, we present ReLE (Robust Efficient Live Evaluation), a scalable system designed to diagnose Capability Anisotropy, the non-uniformity of model performance across domains. Using ReLE, we evaluate 304 models (189 commercial, 115 open-source) across a Domain × Capability orthogonal matrix comprising 207,843 samples. We introduce two methodological contributions to address current evaluation pitfalls: (1) A Symbolic-Grounded Hybrid Scoring Mechanism that eliminates embedding-based false positives in reasoning tasks; (2) A Dynamic Variance-Aware Scheduler based on Neyman allocation with noise correction, which reduces compute costs by 70% compared to full-pass evaluations while maintaining a ranking correlation of ρ=0.96. Our analysis reveals that aggregate rankings are highly sensitive to weighting schemes: models exhibit a Rank Stability Amplitude (RSA) of 11.4 in ReLE versus ~5.0 in traditional benchmarks, confirming that modern models are highly specialized rather than generally superior. We position ReLE not as a replacement for comprehensive static benchmarks, but as a high-frequency diagnostic monitor for the evolving model landscape.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  4. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  5. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  6. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  7. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  8. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  9. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
  10. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  11. 2023CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinesecited by 449
  12. 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 278
5 more
  1. 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
  2. 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 152
  3. 2024CompassJudger-1: All-in-one Judge Model Helps Model Evaluation and Evolutioncited by 42
  4. 2019Learning Latent Parameters without Human Response Patterns: Item Response Theory with Artificial Crowdscited by 40
  5. 2025A Survey on Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.