mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

QG-SMS: Enhancing Test Item Analysis via Student Modeling and Simulation

arXiv 2503.05888 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While the Question Generation (QG) task has been increasingly adopted in educational assessments, its evaluation remains limited by approaches that lack a clear connection to the educational values of test items. In this work, we introduce test item analysis, a method frequently used by educators to assess test question quality, into QG evaluation. Specifically, we construct pairs of candidate questions that differ in quality across dimensions such as topic coverage, item difficulty, item discrimination, and distractor efficiency. We then examine whether existing QG evaluation approaches can effectively distinguish these differences. Our findings reveal significant shortcomings in these approaches with respect to accurately assessing test item quality in relation to student performance. To address this gap, we propose a novel QG evaluation framework, QG-SMS, which leverages Large Language Model for Student Modeling and Simulation to perform test item analysis. As demonstrated in our extensive experiments and human evaluation study, the additional perspectives introduced by the simulated student profiles lead to a more effective and robust assessment of test items.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2025.

Builds on

24 of 48 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  6. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  7. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
  8. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 302
  9. 2023AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generationcited by 216
  10. 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
  11. 2024Simulating Classroom Education with LLM-Empowered Agentscited by 127
  12. 2023Branch-Solve-Merge Improves Large Language Model Evaluation and Generationcited by 106
12 more
  1. 2023CoMPosT: Characterizing and Evaluating Caricature in LLM Simulationscited by 97
  2. 2024Generative Students: Using LLM-Simulated Student Profiles to Support Question Item Evaluationcited by 58
  3. 2024Self-Alignment of Large Language Models via Monopolylogue-based Social Scene Simulationcited by 46
  4. 2019Learning Latent Parameters without Human Response Patterns: Item Response Theory with Artificial Crowdscited by 40
  5. 2023CoQuest: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based Agentcited by 34
  6. 2022Towards Process-Oriented, Modular, and Versatile Question Generation that Meets Educational Needscited by 19
  7. 2023Leveraging generative artificial intelligence to simulate student learning behaviorcited by 16
  8. 2020EQG-RACE: Examination-Type Question Generationcited by 15
  9. 2024Can Many-Shot In-Context Learning Help LLMs as Evaluators? A Preliminary Empirical Studycited by 15
  10. 2022Evaluating the Knowledge Dependency of Questionscited by 9
  11. 2024Which questions should I answer? Salience Prediction of Inquisitive Questionscited by 8
  12. 2024Reference-based Metrics Disprove Themselves in Question Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.