Feature-based Individual Fairness in k-Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring fairness in machine learning algorithms is a challenging and essential task. We consider the problem of clustering a set of points while satisfying fairness constraints. While there have been several attempts to capture group fairness in the k-clustering problem, fairness at an individual level is relatively less explored. We introduce a new notion of individual fairness in k-clustering based on features not necessarily used for clustering. We show that this problem is NP-hard and does not admit a constant factor approximation. Therefore, we design a randomized algorithm that guarantees approximation both in terms of minimizing the clustering distance objective and individual fairness under natural restrictions on the distance metric and fairness constraints. Finally, our experimental results against six competing baselines validate that our algorithm produces individually fairer clusters than the fairest baseline by 12.5% on average while also being less costly in terms of the clustering objective than the best baseline by 34.5% on average.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2021.
Builds on
24 of 51 references.
References · 24
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
- 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
- 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
- 2019Guarantees for Spectral Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 72
- 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
12 more
- 2019Fair k-Center Clustering for Data Summarizationcited by 65
- 2020Individual Fairness for k-Clusteringcited by 56
- 2019Coresets for Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 51
- 2019Clustering without Over-Representationcited by 50
- 2018On the cost of essentially fair clusteringscited by 44
- 2021Improved Approximation Algorithms for Individually Fair Clusteringcited by 33
- 2021Better Algorithms for Individually Fair k-Clusteringcited by 28
- 2019Fairness in representation: quantifying stereotyping as a representational harmcited by 26
- 2019A Center in Your Neighborhood: Fairness in Facility Locationcited by 26
- 2020A Notion of Individual Fairness for Clusteringcited by 20
- 2021A New Notion of Individually Fair Clustering: α-Equitable k-Centercited by 18
- 2018Fair Coresets and Streaming Algorithms for Fair k-Means Clusteringcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Proportional Fairness in Clustering: A Social Choice Perspectivecited by 12
- 2024Personalized Reinforcement Learning with a Budget of Policiescited by 4
- 2023Constant Approximation for Individual Preference Stable Clusteringcited by 3
- 2024Scalable Algorithms for Individual Preference Stable Clusteringcited by 1
- 2024Scalable Algorithms for Individual Preference Stable Clustering15 Mar 2024
- 2024Personalized Reinforcement Learning with a Budget of Policies12 Jan 2024
- 2023Proportional Fairness in Clustering: A Social Choice Perspective27 Oct 2023
- 2023Constant Approximation for Individual Preference Stable Clustering28 Sep 2023