mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Fairness-Quality Trade-off in Clustering

arXiv 2408.10002 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in clustering has been considered extensively in the past; however, the trade-off between the two objectives -- e.g., can we sacrifice just a little in the quality of the clustering to significantly increase fairness, or vice-versa? -- has rarely been addressed. We introduce novel algorithms for tracing the complete trade-off curve, or Pareto front, between quality and fairness in clustering problems; that is, computing all clusterings that are not dominated in both objectives by other clusterings. Unlike previous work that deals with specific objectives for quality and fairness, we deal with all objectives for fairness and quality in two general classes encompassing most of the special cases addressed in previous work. Our algorithm must take exponential time in the worst case as the Pareto front itself can be exponential. Even when the Pareto front is polynomial, our algorithm may take exponential time, and we prove that this is inevitable unless P = NP. However, we also present a new polynomial-time algorithm for computing the entire Pareto front when the cluster centers are fixed, and for perhaps the most natural fairness objective: minimizing the sum, over all clusters, of the imbalance between the two groups in each cluster.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.

Builds on

28 of 65 references.

References · 28

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  3. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  4. 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
  5. 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
  6. 2019Proportionally Fair Clusteringcited by 69
  7. 2020Individual Fairness for k-Clusteringcited by 56
  8. 2016Better Guarantees for k-Means and Euclidean k-Median by Primal-Dual Algorithmscited by 54
  9. 2019Coresets for Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 51
  10. 2020Controllable Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 51
  11. 2019Clustering without Over-Representationcited by 50
  12. 2019The stochastic multi-gradient algorithm for multi-objective optimization and its application to supervised machine learningcited by 45
16 more
  1. 2021Scalable Pareto Front Approximation for Deep Multi-Objective Learningcited by 45
  2. 2018On the cost of essentially fair clusteringscited by 44
  3. 2020Fair clustering via equitable group representationscited by 43
  4. 2021Improved Approximation Algorithms for Individually Fair Clusteringcited by 33
  5. 2021Better Algorithms for Individually Fair k-Clusteringcited by 28
  6. 2014An Improved Approximation for k-median, and Positive Correlation in Budgeted Optimizationcited by 26
  7. 2019A Center in Your Neighborhood: Fairness in Facility Locationcited by 26
  8. 2021Fair Clustering Under a Bounded Costcited by 21
  9. 2021A New Notion of Individually Fair Clustering: α-Equitable k-Centercited by 18
  10. 2022Improving Pareto Front Learning via Multi-Sample Hypernetworkscited by 16
  11. 2023Doubly Constrained Fair Clusteringcited by 9
  12. 2024A Scalable Algorithm for Individually Fair K-means Clusteringcited by 8
  13. 2022Approximate Group Fairness for Clusteringcited by 7
  14. 2021Efficient Algorithms For Fair Clustering with a New Fairness Notioncited by 5
  15. 2022Fair Labeled Clusteringcited by 2
  16. 2016Data Structures for Weighted Matching and Extensions to b-matching and f-factorscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.