mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is Deep Reinforcement Learning Really Superhuman on Atari? Leveling the playing field

arXiv 1908.04683 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2019cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consistent and reproducible evaluation of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is not straightforward. In the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE), small changes in environment parameters such as stochasticity or the maximum allowed play time can lead to very different performance. In this work, we discuss the difficulties of comparing different agents trained on ALE. In order to take a step further towards reproducible and comparable DRL, we introduce SABER, a Standardized Atari BEnchmark for general Reinforcement learning algorithms. Our methodology extends previous recommendations and contains a complete set of environment parameters as well as train and test procedures. We then use SABER to evaluate the current state of the art, Rainbow. Furthermore, we introduce a human world records baseline, and argue that previous claims of expert or superhuman performance of DRL might not be accurate. Finally, we propose Rainbow-IQN by extending Rainbow with Implicit Quantile Networks (IQN) leading to new state-of-the-art performance. Source code is available for reproducibility.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: