mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse Transfer Learning via Winning Lottery Tickets

arXiv 1905.07785 ↗First posted 19 May 2019cs.LG cs.NE stat.MLcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recently proposed Lottery Ticket Hypothesis of Frankle and Carbin (2019) suggests that the performance of over-parameterized deep networks is due to the random initialization seeding the network with a small fraction of favorable weights. These weights retain their dominant status throughout training -- in a very real sense, this sub-network "won the lottery" during initialization. The authors find sub-networks via unstructured magnitude pruning with 85-95% of parameters removed that train to the same accuracy as the original network at a similar speed, which they call winning tickets. In this paper, we extend the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to a variety of transfer learning tasks. We show that sparse sub-networks with approximately 90-95% of weights removed achieve (and often exceed) the accuracy of the original dense network in several realistic settings. We experimentally validate this by transferring the sparse representation found via pruning on CIFAR-10 to SmallNORB and FashionMNIST for object recognition tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 4; 2023: 9; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

27 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 200
  2. 2023Modular Deep Learningcited by 82
  3. 2021Sanity Checks for Lottery Tickets: Does Your Winning Ticket Really Win the Jackpot?cited by 52
  4. 2021How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?cited by 50
  5. 2021Efficient Lottery Ticket Finding: Less Data is Morecited by 44
  6. 2021GANs Can Play Lottery Tickets Toocited by 32
  7. 2022Exploring Lottery Ticket Hypothesis in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 25
  8. 2021On Lottery Tickets and Minimal Task Representations in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  9. 2023Rethinking Graph Lottery Tickets: Graph Sparsity Matterscited by 23
  10. 2024A Survey of Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 23
  11. 2021Towards Understanding Iterative Magnitude Pruning: Why Lottery Tickets Wincited by 11
  12. 2023Differentially Private Video Activity Recognitioncited by 9
15 more
  1. 2021Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspectivecited by 8
  2. 2023On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Surveycited by 7
  3. 2022Data-Efficient Double-Win Lottery Tickets from Robust Pre-trainingcited by 5
  4. 2023Uncovering the Hidden Cost of Model Compressioncited by 3
  5. 2021S-Cyc: A Learning Rate Schedule for Iterative Pruning of ReLU-based Networkscited by 2
  6. 2023Towards Compute-Optimal Transfer Learningcited by 2
  7. 2024Optimal Eye Surgeon: Finding Image Priors through Sparse Generators at Initializationcited by 2
  8. 2023Considering Layerwise Importance in the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 1
  9. 2024On How Iterative Magnitude Pruning Discovers Local Receptive Fields in Fully Connected Neural Networkscited by 1
  10. 2022Optimizing Learning Rate Schedules for Iterative Pruning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
  11. 2022AP: Selective Activation for De-sparsifying Pruned Neural Networkscited by 0
  12. 2023Transferability of Winning Lottery Tickets in Neural Network Differential Equation Solverscited by 0
  13. 2024What to Do When Your Discrete Optimization Is the Size of a Neural Network?cited by 0
  14. 2026Beyond Transfer Accuracy: Mechanism-Guided Controlled Adaptation for Low-Resource Languagescited by 0
  15. 2026Man, Machine, and Mathematicscited by 0