Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundational work on the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis has suggested an exciting corollary: winning tickets found in the context of one task can be transferred to similar tasks, possibly even across different architectures. This has generated broad interest, but methods to study this universality are lacking. We make use of renormalization group theory, a powerful tool from theoretical physics, to address this need. We find that iterative magnitude pruning, the principal algorithm used for discovering winning tickets, is a renormalization group scheme, and can be viewed as inducing a flow in parameter space. We demonstrate that ResNet-50 models with transferable winning tickets have flows with common properties, as would be expected from the theory. Similar observations are made for BERT models, with evidence that their flows are near fixed points. Additionally, we leverage our framework to study winning tickets transferred across ResNet architectures, observing that smaller models have flows with more uniform properties than larger models, complicating transfer between them.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2021.
Builds on
35 of 73 references.
References · 35
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2021DeepViT: Towards Deeper Vision Transformercited by 288
- 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
- 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
- 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 208
- 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
23 more
- 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 181
- 2021The Principles of Deep Learning Theorycited by 169
- 2020The Early Phase of Neural Network Trainingcited by 114
- 2020When BERT Plays the Lottery, All Tickets Are Winningcited by 114
- 2019One ticket to win them all: generalizing lottery ticket initializations across datasets and optimizerscited by 102
- 2016Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?cited by 100
- 2020The Lottery Tickets Hypothesis for Supervised and Self-supervised Pre-training in Computer Vision Modelscited by 91
- 2020Gradient Flow in Sparse Neural Networks and How Lottery Tickets Wincited by 77
- 2019Playing the lottery with rewards and multiple languages: lottery tickets in RL and NLPcited by 73
- 2020Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the Jackpotcited by 66
- 2014An exact mapping between the Variational Renormalization Group and Deep Learningcited by 52
- 2021Vision Transformers with Patch Diversificationcited by 45
- 2020On the Predictability of Pruning Across Scalescited by 33
- 2017Mutual Information, Neural Networks and the Renormalization Groupcited by 32
- 2019Sparse Transfer Learning via Winning Lottery Ticketscited by 27
- 2019Evaluating Lottery Tickets Under Distributional Shiftscited by 23
- 2020Lottery Tickets in Linear Models: An Analysis of Iterative Magnitude Pruningcited by 23
- 2021The Elastic Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 23
- 2018Scale-invariant Feature Extraction of Neural Network and Renormalization Group Flowcited by 14
- 2021Towards Understanding Iterative Magnitude Pruning: Why Lottery Tickets Wincited by 11
- 2020On the Transferability of Winning Tickets in Non-Natural Image Datasetscited by 10
- 2016PCA meets RGcited by 8
- 2016Comment on "Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?" [arXiv:1608.08225]cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2025Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomenacited by 5
- 2023Iterative Magnitude Pruning as a Renormalisation Group: A Study in The Context of The Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 1
- 2024On How Iterative Magnitude Pruning Discovers Local Receptive Fields in Fully Connected Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2023Transferability of Winning Lottery Tickets in Neural Network Differential Equation Solverscited by 0
- 2024Chasing Better Deep Image Priors between Over- and Under-parameterizationcited by 0
- 2025FINDER: Feature Inference on Noisy Datasets using Eigenspace Residualscited by 0
- 2026Man, Machine, and Mathematicscited by 0
- 2026Pre-registered tests of solid-state-physics-inspired LLM compression: a cluster-level negative result at small-language-model scalecited by 0
- 2026Pre-registered tests of solid-state-physics-inspired LLM compression: a cluster-level negative result at small-language-model scale28 Sep 2026
- 2026Man, Machine, and Mathematics29 Apr 2026
- 2025FINDER: Feature Inference on Noisy Datasets using Eigenspace Residuals22 Oct 2025
- 2025Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena11 Mar 2025
- 2024On How Iterative Magnitude Pruning Discovers Local Receptive Fields in Fully Connected Neural Networks9 Dec 2024
- 2024Chasing Better Deep Image Priors between Over- and Under-parameterization31 Oct 2024
- 2023Iterative Magnitude Pruning as a Renormalisation Group: A Study in The Context of The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis6 Aug 2023
- 2023Transferability of Winning Lottery Tickets in Neural Network Differential Equation Solvers16 Jun 2023