Interpretable Ensemble Learning for Materials Property Prediction with Classical Interatomic Potentials: Carbon as an Example
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) is widely used to explore crystal materials and predict their properties. However, the training is time-consuming for deep-learning models, and the regression process is a black box that is hard to interpret. Also, the preprocess to transfer a crystal structure into the input of ML, called descriptor, needs to be designed carefully. To efficiently predict important properties of materials, we propose an approach based on ensemble learning consisting of regression trees to predict formation energy and elastic constants based on small-size datasets of carbon allotropes as an example. Without using any descriptor, the inputs are the properties calculated by molecular dynamics with 9 different classical interatomic potentials. Overall, the results from ensemble learning are more accurate than those from classical interatomic potentials, and ensemble learning can capture the relatively accurate properties from the 9 classical potentials as criteria for predicting the final properties.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.
Builds on
2 of 74 references.
References · 2
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regressioncited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.