mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimal scheduling of entropy regulariser for continuous-time linear-quadratic reinforcement learning

arXiv 2208.04466 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2022cs.LG math.OC math.PRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work uses the entropy-regularised relaxed stochastic control perspective as a principled framework for designing reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. Herein agent interacts with the environment by generating noisy controls distributed according to the optimal relaxed policy. The noisy policies on the one hand, explore the space and hence facilitate learning but, on the other hand, introduce bias by assigning a positive probability to non-optimal actions. This exploration-exploitation trade-off is determined by the strength of entropy regularisation. We study algorithms resulting from two entropy regularisation formulations: the exploratory control approach, where entropy is added to the cost objective, and the proximal policy update approach, where entropy penalises policy divergence between consecutive episodes. We focus on the finite horizon continuous-time linear-quadratic (LQ) RL problem, where a linear dynamics with unknown drift coefficients is controlled subject to quadratic costs. In this setting, both algorithms yield a Gaussian relaxed policy. We quantify the precise difference between the value functions of a Gaussian policy and its noisy evaluation and show that the execution noise must be independent across time. By tuning the frequency of sampling from relaxed policies and the parameter governing the strength of entropy regularisation, we prove that the regret, for both learning algorithms, is of the order O(√N) (up to a logarithmic factor) over N episodes, matching the best known result from the literature.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2022.

Builds on

16 of 37 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 279
  3. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 151
  4. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
  5. 2021Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithmscited by 76
  6. 2017Boltzmann Exploration Done Rightcited by 69
  7. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
  8. 2020Entropy Regularization for Mean Field Games with Learningcited by 50
  9. 2020Logarithmic regret for episodic continuous-time linear-quadratic reinforcement learning over a finite-time horizoncited by 31
  10. 2021Reinforcement learning for linear-convex models with jumps via stability analysis of feedback controlscited by 21
  11. 2019Certainty Equivalence is Efficient for Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
  12. 2020Regularity and stability of feedback relaxed controlscited by 12
4 more
  1. 2020Exploratory LQG Mean Field Games with Entropy Regularizationcited by 11
  2. 2020A modified MSA for stochastic control problemscited by 8
  3. 2022Logarithmic regret bounds for continuous-time average-reward Markov decision processescited by 7
  4. 2022Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Controlling Unknown Linear Diffusion Processescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.