mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A relaxed technical assumption for posterior sampling-based reinforcement learning for control of unknown linear systems

arXiv 2108.08502 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2021eess.SY cs.AI cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We revisit the Thompson sampling algorithm to control an unknown linear quadratic (LQ) system recently proposed by Ouyang et al (arXiv:1709.04047). The regret bound of the algorithm was derived under a technical assumption on the induced norm of the closed loop system. In this technical note, we show that by making a minor modification in the algorithm (in particular, ensuring that an episode does not end too soon), this technical assumption on the induced norm can be replaced by a milder assumption in terms of the spectral radius of the closed loop system. The modified algorithm has the same Bayesian regret of tildeO(√T), where T is the time-horizon and the tildeO(·) notation hides logarithmic terms in~T.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2021.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
  2. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  3. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
  4. 2018On Adaptive Linear-Quadratic Regulatorscited by 21
  5. 2018Input Perturbations for Adaptive Control and Learningcited by 18
  6. 2020Efficient Optimistic Exploration in Linear-Quadratic Regulators via Lagrangian Relaxationcited by 18
  7. 2019Certainty Equivalence is Efficient for Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
  8. 2014Bayesian Optimal Control of Smoothly Parameterized Systems: The Lazy Posterior Sampling Algorithmcited by 11
  9. 2020Thompson sampling for linear quadratic mean-field teamscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.