Parenting: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Input
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous agents trained via reinforcement learning present numerous safety concerns: reward hacking, negative side effects, and unsafe exploration, among others. In the context of near-future autonomous agents, operating in environments where humans understand the existing dangers, human involvement in the learning process has proved a promising approach to AI Safety. Here we demonstrate that a precise framework for learning from human input, loosely inspired by the way humans parent children, solves a broad class of safety problems in this context. We show that our Parenting algorithm solves these problems in the relevant AI Safety gridworlds of Leike et al. (2017), that an agent can learn to outperform its parent as it "matures", and that policies learnt through Parenting are generalisable to new environments.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
- 2023PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 38
- 2023A Human-Centered Safe Robot Reinforcement Learning Framework with Interactive Behaviorscited by 13
- 2024FAWAC: Feasibility Informed Advantage Weighted Regression for Persistent Safety in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2022Argumentative Reward Learning: Reasoning About Human Preferencescited by 2
- 2026Learning Safe Agent Behaviour from Human Preferences and Justifications via World Modelscited by 0
- 2026Learning Safe Agent Behaviour from Human Preferences and Justifications via World Models14 Jul 2026
- 2024FAWAC: Feasibility Informed Advantage Weighted Regression for Persistent Safety in Offline Reinforcement Learning12 Dec 2024
- 2023PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback3 Aug 2023
- 2023A Human-Centered Safe Robot Reinforcement Learning Framework with Interactive Behaviors25 Feb 2023
- 2022Argumentative Reward Learning: Reasoning About Human Preferences28 Sep 2022
- 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applications20 May 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Imagine to Ensure Safety in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
- 2025SafeWork-R1: Coevolving Safety and Intelligence under the AI-45circ Law
- 2025The Oversight Game: Learning to Cooperatively Balance an AI Agent's Safety and Autonomy
- 2025From Refusal to Recovery: A Control-Theoretic Approach to Generative AI Guardrails
- 2026Agentic Safety is an Epistemic Property, Not a Behavioral One
- 2026Reward Hacking in Language Model Agents: Revisiting AI Safety Gridworlds
- 2026Discovering Agentic Safety Specifications from 1-Bit Danger Signals
- 2026Pedagogical Safety in Educational Reinforcement Learning: Formalizing and Detecting Reward Hacking in AI Tutoring Systems