mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are All Training Examples Created Equal? An Empirical Study

arXiv 1811.12569 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2018cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern computer vision algorithms often rely on very large training datasets. However, it is conceivable that a carefully selected subsample of the dataset is sufficient for training. In this paper, we propose a gradient-based importance measure that we use to empirically analyze relative importance of training images in four datasets of varying complexity. We find that in some cases, a small subsample is indeed sufficient for training. For other datasets, however, the relative differences in importance are negligible. These results have important implications for active learning on deep networks. Additionally, our analysis method can be used as a general tool to better understand diversity of training examples in datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: