Semantically Redundant Training Data Removal and Deep Model Classification Performance: A Study with Chest X-rays
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated its innate capacity to independently learn hierarchical features from complex and multi-dimensional data. A common understanding is that its performance scales up with the amount of training data. Another data attribute is the inherent variety. It follows, therefore, that semantic redundancy, which is the presence of similar or repetitive information, would tend to lower performance and limit generalizability to unseen data. In medical imaging data, semantic redundancy can occur due to the presence of multiple images that have highly similar presentations for the disease of interest. Further, the common use of augmentation methods to generate variety in DL training may be limiting performance when applied to semantically redundant data. We propose an entropy-based sample scoring approach to identify and remove semantically redundant training data. We demonstrate using the publicly available NIH chest X-ray dataset that the model trained on the resulting informative subset of training data significantly outperforms the model trained on the full training set, during both internal (recall: 0.7164 vs 0.6597, p<0.05) and external testing (recall: 0.3185 vs 0.2589, p<0.05). Our findings emphasize the importance of information-oriented training sample selection as opposed to the conventional practice of using all available training data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2023.
Builds on
11 of 26 references.
References · 11
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2019Semantic Redundancies in Image-Classification Datasets: The 10% You Don't Needcited by 43
- 2018Are All Training Examples Created Equal? An Empirical Studycited by 16
- 2021Chest X-Ray Bone Suppression for Improving Classification of Tuberculosis-Consistent Findingscited by 13
- 2018Learning From Less Data: Diversified Subset Selection and Active Learning in Image Classification Taskscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.