Automatic Pruning of Fine-tuning Datasets for Transformer-based Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer-based language models have shown state-of-the-art performance on a variety of natural language understanding tasks. To achieve this performance, these models are first pre-trained on general corpus and then fine-tuned on downstream tasks. Previous work studied the effect of pruning the training set of the downstream tasks on the performance of the model on its evaluation set. In this work, we propose an automatic dataset pruning method for the training set of fine-tuning tasks. Our method is based on the model's success rate in correctly classifying each training data point. Unlike previous work which relies on user feedback to determine subset size, our method automatically extracts training subsets that are adapted for each pair of model and fine-tuning task. Our method provides multiple subsets for use in dataset pruning that navigate the trade-off between subset size and evaluation accuracy. Our largest subset, which we also refer to as the winning ticket subset, is on average 3 × smaller than the original training set of the fine-tuning task. Our experiments on 5 downstream tasks and 2 language models show that, on average, fine-tuning on the winning ticket subsets results in a 0.1 % increase in the evaluation performance of the model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.
Builds on
18 of 21 references.
References · 18
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
6 more
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 139
- 2021NAS-BERT: Task-Agnostic and Adaptive-Size BERT Compression with Neural Architecture Searchcited by 55
- 2020AdaBERT: Task-Adaptive BERT Compression with Differentiable Neural Architecture Searchcited by 51
- 2022On the Transformation of Latent Space in Fine-Tuned NLP Modelscited by 19
- 2022BERT on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples by Gradient-Based Pruningcited by 17
- 2018Are All Training Examples Created Equal? An Empirical Studycited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.