Exploring Data Redundancy in Real-world Image Classification through Data Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models often require large amounts of data for training, leading to increased costs. It is particularly challenging in medical imaging, i.e., gathering distributed data for centralized training, and meanwhile, obtaining quality labels remains a tedious job. Many methods have been proposed to address this issue in various training paradigms, e.g., continual learning, active learning, and federated learning, which indeed demonstrate certain forms of the data valuation process. However, existing methods are either overly intuitive or limited to common clean/toy datasets in the experiments. In this work, we present two data valuation metrics based on Synaptic Intelligence and gradient norms, respectively, to study the redundancy in real-world image data. Novel online and offline data selection algorithms are then proposed via clustering and grouping based on the examined data values. Our online approach effectively evaluates data utilizing layerwise model parameter updates and gradients in each epoch and can accelerate model training with fewer epochs and a subset (e.g., 19%-59%) of data while maintaining equivalent levels of accuracy in a variety of datasets. It also extends to the offline coreset construction, producing subsets of only 18%-30% of the original. The codes for the proposed adaptive data selection and coreset computation are available (https://github.com/ZhenyuTANG2023/data_selection).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2023.
Builds on
42 of 61 references.
References · 42
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
- 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
30 more
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
- 2018Selective Experience Replay for Lifelong Learningcited by 239
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 233
- 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 224
- 2018Adversarial Active Learning for Deep Networks: a Margin Based Approachcited by 155
- 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 146
- 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
- 2020Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 95
- 2021M6: A Chinese Multimodal Pretrainercited by 91
- 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 88
- 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 79
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 73
- 2023Fair Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Client Contribution Estimationcited by 50
- 2020FMore: An Incentive Scheme of Multi-dimensional Auction for Federated Learning in MECcited by 48
- 2019Semantic Redundancies in Image-Classification Datasets: The 10% You Don't Needcited by 43
- 2019Toward an Automated Auction Framework for Wireless Federated Learning Services Marketcited by 38
- 2021Game of Gradients: Mitigating Irrelevant Clients in Federated Learningcited by 35
- 2019Interpret Federated Learning with Shapley Valuescited by 33
- 2020Hierarchically Fair Federated Learningcited by 28
- 2018Are All Training Examples Created Equal? An Empirical Studycited by 16
- 2021Transparent Contribution Evaluation for Secure Federated Learning on Blockchaincited by 16
- 2022Practical Recommendations for Replay-based Continual Learning Methodscited by 16
- 2020Estimation of Individual Device Contributions for Incentivizing Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2021FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2019LCA: Loss Change Allocation for Neural Network Trainingcited by 9
- 2022CASS: Cross Architectural Self-Supervision for Medical Image Analysiscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.