mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adding Neural Network Controllers to Behavior Trees without Destroying Performance Guarantees

arXiv 1809.10283 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2018cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we show how Behavior Trees that have performance guarantees, in terms of safety and goal convergence, can be extended with components that were designed using machine learning, without destroying those performance guarantees. Machine learning approaches such as reinforcement learning or learning from demonstration can be very appealing to AI designers that want efficient and realistic behaviors in their agents. However, those algorithms seldom provide guarantees for solving the given task in all different situations while keeping the agent safe. Instead, such guarantees are often easier to find for manually designed model-based approaches. In this paper we exploit the modularity of behavior trees to extend a given design with an efficient, but possibly unreliable, machine learning component in a way that preserves the guarantees. The approach is illustrated with an inverted pendulum example.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extraction
  2. 2024Optimizing Interpretable Decision Tree Policies for Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2023Optimal Decision Tree Policies for Markov Decision Processes
  4. 2024Solving Offline Reinforcement Learning with Decision Tree Regression
  5. 2024Distilling Reinforcement Learning Policies for Interpretable Robot Locomotion: Gradient Boosting Machines and Symbolic Regression
  6. 2022Reward Learning with Trees: Methods and Evaluation
  7. 2022Reinforcement Learning for Branch-and-Bound Optimisation using Retrospective Trajectories
  8. 2022Learning Interpretable, High-Performing Policies for Autonomous Driving