mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Linguistic Minimal Pairs Elicit Linguistic Similarity in Large Language Models

arXiv 2409.12435 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel analysis that leverages linguistic minimal pairs to probe the internal linguistic representations of Large Language Models (LLMs). By measuring the similarity between LLM activation differences across minimal pairs, we quantify the and gain insight into the linguistic knowledge captured by LLMs. Our large-scale experiments, spanning 100+ LLMs and 150k minimal pairs in three languages, reveal properties of linguistic similarity from four key aspects: consistency across LLMs, relation to theoretical categorizations, dependency to semantic context, and cross-lingual alignment of relevant phenomena. Our findings suggest that 1) linguistic similarity is significantly influenced by training data exposure, leading to higher cross-LLM agreement in higher-resource languages. 2) Linguistic similarity strongly aligns with fine-grained theoretical linguistic categories but weakly with broader ones. 3) Linguistic similarity shows a weak correlation with semantic similarity, showing its context-dependent nature. 4) LLMs exhibit limited cross-lingual alignment in their understanding of relevant linguistic phenomena. This work demonstrates the potential of minimal pairs as a window into the neural representations of language in LLMs, shedding light on the relationship between LLMs and linguistic theory. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/ChenDelong1999/Linguistic-Similarity

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2024.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  3. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  4. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  5. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  6. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  7. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  8. 2024Do Llamas Work in English? On the Latent Language of Multilingual Transformerscited by 281
  9. 2024Language-Specific Neurons: The Key to Multilingual Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 126
  10. 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
  11. 2024On the Multilingual Ability of Decoder-based Pre-trained Language Models: Finding and Controlling Language-Specific Neuronscited by 83
  12. 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
9 more
  1. 2024CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic taskscited by 46
  2. 2024Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?cited by 41
  3. 2019Structural Supervision Improves Learning of Non-Local Grammatical Dependenciescited by 24
  4. 2024Decoding Probing: Revealing Internal Linguistic Structures in Neural Language Models using Minimal Pairscited by 24
  5. 2024RuBLiMP: Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 24
  6. 2024Language Models as Models of Languagecited by 24
  7. 2018RNNs as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependencycited by 23
  8. 2022Assessing the Capacity of Transformer to Abstract Syntactic Representations: A Contrastive Analysis Based on Long-distance Agreementcited by 7
  9. 2024Interpretability of Language Models via Task Spacescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.