Contrastive Decoding for Synthetic Data Generation in Low-Resource Language Modeling
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → LLM synthetic data generation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are trained on huge amounts of textual data, and concerns have been raised that the limits of such data may soon be reached. A potential solution is to train on synthetic data sampled from LLMs. In this work, we build on this idea and investigate the benefits of contrastive decoding for generating synthetic corpora. In a controlled setting, we experiment with sampling corpora using the relative difference between a good and bad model trained on the same original corpus of 100 million words. By amplifying the signal from a model that has better performance, we create a synthetic corpus and mix it with the original training data. Our findings show that training on a mixture of synthesized and real data improves performance on the language modeling objective and a range of downstream tasks. In particular, we see that training with a mix of synthetic data from contrastive decoding benefits tasks that require more reasoning skills, while synthetic data from traditional sampling helps more on tasks dependent on surface level linguistic capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM synthetic data generation, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 38 references.
References · 16
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'cited by 115
- 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 88
- 2024Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 55
- 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
- 2025BabyLM Turns 3: Call for papers for the 2025 BabyLM workshopcited by 24
4 more
- 2018Back-Translation Sampling by Targeting Difficult Words in Neural Machine Translationcited by 19
- 2024Distillation Contrastive Decoding: Improving LLMs Reasoning with Contrastive Decoding and Distillationcited by 16
- 2024Explaining and Improving Contrastive Decoding by Extrapolating the Probabilities of a Huge and Hypothetical LMcited by 11
- 2021Midheind's WMT 2021 submissioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code
- 2025Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models
- 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitations
- 2023Synthetic Data Generation in Low-Resource Settings via Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
- 2023Steering Language Generation: Harnessing Contrastive Expert Guidance and Negative Prompting for Coherent and Diverse Synthetic Data Generation
- 2024Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective
- 2023Contrastive Decoding Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and Pitfalls