mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Synthetic Data for Back Translation

arXiv 2310.13675 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Back translation (BT) is one of the most significant technologies in NMT research fields. Existing attempts on BT share a common characteristic: they employ either beam search or random sampling to generate synthetic data with a backward model but seldom work studies the role of synthetic data in the performance of BT. This motivates us to ask a fundamental question: em what kind of synthetic data contributes to BT performance? Through both theoretical and empirical studies, we identify two key factors on synthetic data controlling the back-translation NMT performance, which are quality and importance. Furthermore, based on our findings, we propose a simple yet effective method to generate synthetic data to better trade off both factors so as to yield a better performance for BT. We run extensive experiments on WMT14 DE-EN, EN-DE, and RU-EN benchmark tasks. By employing our proposed method to generate synthetic data, our BT model significantly outperforms the standard BT baselines (i.e., beam and sampling based methods for data generation), which proves the effectiveness of our proposed methods.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.

Builds on

31 of 58 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  8. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  9. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  10. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  11. 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 250
  12. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 197
19 more
  1. 2015On Using Monolingual Corpora in Neural Machine Translationcited by 149
  2. 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 148
  3. 2016Dual Learning for Machine Translationcited by 146
  4. 2017Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 139
  5. 2018Phrase-Based & Neural Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 138
  6. 2018Style Transfer Through Back-Translationcited by 124
  7. 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
  8. 2019Tagged Back-Translationcited by 76
  9. 2018SwitchOut: an Efficient Data Augmentation Algorithm for Neural Machine Translationcited by 72
  10. 2018Regularizing Neural Machine Translation by Target-bidirectional Agreementcited by 40
  11. 2019On The Evaluation of Machine Translation Systems Trained With Back-Translationcited by 40
  12. 2019Improving Back-Translation with Uncertainty-based Confidence Estimationcited by 34
  13. 2021Mask Attention Networks: Rethinking and Strengthen Transformercited by 28
  14. 2018Back-Translation Sampling by Targeting Difficult Words in Neural Machine Translationcited by 19
  15. 2019Generalizing Back-Translation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 18
  16. 2019Detecting Overfitting via Adversarial Examplescited by 15
  17. 2020Decoding and Diversity in Machine Translationcited by 15
  18. 2020Evaluating Explanation Methods for Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
  19. 2021Data Augmentation for Text Generation Without Any Augmented Datacited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.