mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Query-Reward Tradeoffs in Multi-Armed Bandits

arXiv 2110.05724 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a stochastic multi-armed bandit setting where reward must be actively queried for it to be observed. We provide tight lower and upper problem-dependent guarantees on both the regret and the number of queries. Interestingly, we prove that there is a fundamental difference between problems with a unique and multiple optimal arms, unlike in the standard multi-armed bandit problem. We also present a new, simple, UCB-style sampling concept, and show that it naturally adapts to the number of optimal arms and achieves tight regret and querying bounds.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2021.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
  2. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  3. 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 104
  4. 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 79
  5. 2014Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit and Its Extension to Probabilistically Triggered Armscited by 78
  6. 2021Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Bounds for Tabular MDPs via Adaptive Multi-Step Bootstrapcited by 48
  7. 2018KL-UCB-switch: optimal regret bounds for stochastic bandits from both a distribution-dependent and a distribution-free viewpointscited by 20
  8. 2021A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 15
  9. 2021Confidence-Budget Matching for Sequential Budgeted Learningcited by 11
  10. 2020Lenient Regret for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.